A-level Physics - Faradays Law and Electromagnetic Induction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a problem related to Faraday's Law and electromagnetic induction, specifically focusing on induced electromotive force (EMF) in a coil entering and exiting a magnetic field. The user successfully calculated the induced EMF as 80mV while the coil is entering the field, confirming that the induced voltage remains constant due to a uniform rate of change in flux linkage. It was clarified that once the coil is fully within the field, the induced EMF drops to zero, and as it exits, the induced EMF returns to 80mV but in the opposite direction, resulting in a negative reading. The user expressed confusion about the graph shape mentioned in the mark scheme but gained clarity on the behavior of the induced voltage during the coil's movement. Overall, the explanation helped solidify the user's understanding of the concepts involved.
I like number
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The problem can be found http://www.drewett-gray.co.uk/alevel/ff&e/papers/ffe_04_Jun.pdf" (page 10 and 11) Question 4 part B i and ii
Mark Scheme if needed http://www.drewett-gray.co.uk/alevel/ff&e/papers/FFE_04_Jun_MS.pdf"

Homework Equations


Faradays law: The induced emf is directly proportional to the rate of change of flux linkage.
Induced EMF = flux change/time
Induced EMF = Blx/t = Blv


The Attempt at a Solution


Question 4 Part B)i
I have attempted this by following the method of a similar problem in my revision guide.
So after 0.2 seconds the coil enters the field...
Information I have:

N=1250
B=0.032 T
V=0.10 ms^-1

Induced EMF = Blv*N = 0.032*0.02*0.1*1250
=0.08 = 80mV as required
I've used this because (l*v = l * x/t which is the area cut per unit time). I know it got the right answer but I'm not sure if my method is legitimate or not.

Part B ii)
This part has been giving me real trouble.
The way I understand it there will be no reading on the voltmeter until 0.2 seconds because the coil has not entered the field.
I'm not sure what happens when it enters the field, but I think the voltage will increase as the coil enters the field, because more and more coil is cutting the field per unit time. Then once all the coil is in the field it will be constant for a while, and then will decrease as the coil leaves the field.
However the markscheme talks about having some graph in the negative region, and I'm not sure why this should be the case.
Another thing I was thinking was trying to work out the voltage at certain times to get a rough idea of the shape of the graph.


Thanks

I Like Number
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
While the coil is entering the field, the induced voltage will remain constant at that value you calculated, 80mV.
This is because the flux linking the coil is increasing uniformly as it enters the field. More and more flux links as it moves. As Faraday's Law says the emf depends on the rate of change of flux, then so long as the rate change is uniform, and it is, the emf will be constant.
When fully in the field, there is no further change in the flux linking the coil so the induced emf will be zero.
When leaving the field, the rate of change is the same as when it entered, except the flux linkage is decreasing now, not increasing. So the emf induced will again be 80mV but in the opposite direction. (ie negative)
When fully out of the field, the emf will be zero again.
 
Thank you! That made a lot of sense and I understood it :D
I'm going to mull over it, have another shot at the question a little later and let you know how I get on/ if there is anything I don't fully grasp.

Thanks once again.
 
I like number said:
Thank you! That made a lot of sense and I understood it :D
I'm going to mull over it, have another shot at the question a little later and let you know how I get on/ if there is anything I don't fully grasp.

Thanks once again.

You're welcome.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top