Acceleration of Forces Challenge Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics challenge problem involving two masses, m1 and m2, with static and kinetic friction considerations. The user calculated the accelerations of both masses after determining that m2 would move due to the applied force exceeding static friction. However, the analysis indicates a misunderstanding regarding the role of static friction; it is crucial for determining whether the two masses move together or separately. The bottom mass, m1, is on a frictionless surface, meaning any force will cause movement, and the user must assess if the masses accelerate together or not. Clarification is needed on the reference frame used for calculating the acceleration of m1, as it affects the interpretation of the results.
tdub96
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
So I was given a challenge problem in physics class that reads...

Mass m1=40kg, is sitting on a frictionless floor while m2=10kg sits on top of it. Between each mass, the coefficient of static friction is .6, and the kinetic coefficient is .4. M2 is pulled by a force of 100N to the left. What are the accelerations of each mass?

I solved it and got answers that do make sense, I'm just looking for a second opinion as to whether I did it right or not. Here's my work...

F(kinetic)=.4(10kg)(9.8)=39.2N
F(static)=.6(10kg)(9.8)=58.8N
The force pulling mass 2 is of 100N, which is >58.8N of friction, so the mass will move.

m1=ƩF=ma
F(friction m2)=ma
-39.2N=40kg(a)
a=-.98m/s^2

m2=ƩF=ma
100N-39.2N=10kg(a)
A=-6.08m/s^2.

Since m1 is moving along with m2, I added the -.98 to the -6.08 to get the total acceleration of mass 2 to be -7.06m/s^2. Yet I feel like I must use static friction for something other than proving that the mass will move. However, it could be in there just to throw us students off. Did I do this correctly, or is there another route to take to a correct answer?

All help is appreciated!
-TW
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This should be posted in the Homework section as per PF rules. That way you can get the best help possible!
 
Your analysis is not quite right, even though the values for the two accelerations are OK.
The question here is not if m2 will move or not. The bottom surface being frictionless, any non-zero force will move the system of the two objects. The question is if they move together (same acceleration) or they have different accelerations. Here is where you need the static friction. If the analysis shows that they don't move together, then you use kinetic friction.

And regarding your last step, in what reference frame did you calculate a1?
 
I'm not quite sure I know what you mean by reference frame...

Mass 1 is moving because of the friction between it and m2, which is above it. The force of 100N is only applied to m2.
 
The acceleration a1 is relative to the ground or to the big body (m2)?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top