Angular Velocity from Potential and Mechanical Energy of rotating rod

AI Thread Summary
To find the angular velocity of a falling rod when it meets the horizontal, the potential energy (U) can be equated to the mechanical energy at that point. The relevant equation is U = (1/2)MgL, where L represents the length to the center of mass. The moment of inertia (I) is also necessary for calculating kinetic energy (K), given by K = (1/2)Iw². The initial potential energy should use the altitude of the center of mass without the (1/2) factor. This approach correctly leads to solving for angular velocity (ω).
jstep
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am asked to find the angular velocity of a falling rod in the instant that the rod meets the horizontal. The system is set up in this image:

1sdszo.jpg


The only force acting on the rod is gravity

Homework Equations



U = (1/2)MgL
K = (1/2)Iw2
Kf + Uf = Ki + Ui

The Attempt at a Solution



Can I solve this by using the potential energy of the rod with this equation:

U = (1/2)MgL

and then equating that to the Mechanical Energy at the point that it meets the horizontal?

I know the moment of inertia of the rod so if I do (1/2)MgL = (1/2)Iw2 and solve for omega, is that correct?

Also, when finding the initial potential energy, should i use the full length of the rod or only the length to the center of mass?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yes, you are correct. to calculate the initial potential energy, just use the altitude of the center of mass and drop the (1/2), that should not be there.

good luck
 
Oh okay, so let me just make sure I understand:

so this is the correct way to find the initial potential energy?

U = mgLsin\theta

where L is the length to the center of mass
 
correct.
 
thanks so much!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top