TomTelford
- 29
- 2
Flattening... right.
The discussion revolves around the synchronization and time readings of two clocks, A and B, in the context of special relativity. Participants explore the implications of a spaceship's motion relative to these clocks, examining how time appears to the pilot during acceleration and the effects of relativistic phenomena such as the Lorentz transform and the Doppler effect.
Participants express differing views on the interpretation of time readings and the effects of relativistic phenomena. There is no consensus on the implications of the Lorentz transform or the nature of the perceived time differences during the pilot's journey.
Participants note the importance of distinguishing between when events occur and when they are observed, highlighting the complexities of relativistic effects and the role of reference frames in interpreting time readings.
This discussion may be of interest to those studying special relativity, particularly in understanding the nuances of time synchronization, the effects of motion on time perception, and the implications of relativistic transformations.
TomTelford said:When the lecturer uses phrases like "the person on the train sees...", they are implying 'after removing the effects of doppler shift' or 'only considering the effects of SR' but they don't say it.
TomTelford said:what I'm trying to do now is to take it from what would REALLY be observed, all in, all effects and to be able to say "ok, this part is doppler so take that out and this part is SR or GR".
TomTelford said:Training tells me how to do the math but I still have to build a sense of those relationships in my head in order to make it work while I am flying. An intuitive sense of this much change in power produces this much change in groundspeed.
That's what I'm trying to do with these questions.
TomTelford said:The ship is moving at .5c as it passes clock A which reads noon and it "sees" clock B reading 11am. However the pilot thinks the distance to B is only .866 light hours not 1 lh away and that based on how quickly it observes time passing on clock B that it should read something like 12:07 if it were there right "now" in the ships frame as opposed to noon in clock A's frame?
The Lorentz transforms. It's always the Lorentz transforms. Sometimes they simplify to the time dilation and length contraction formulae, but until you get intuition for when, use the Lorentz transforms.TomTelford said:Now I'm just trying to figure out which formula is used to solve which value being transformed.
While B, according to the ship, is 0.866 lh away "now" as the ship passes A, this doesn't mean that B was 0.866 lh away when the light the ship is seeing "now" left B.TomTelford said:So moving on to the Lorentz part of this situation in case 2 is the following true:
The ship is moving at .5c as it passes clock A which reads noon and it "sees" clock B reading 11am. However the pilot thinks the distance to B is only .866 light hours not 1 lh away and that based on how quickly it observes time passing on clock B that it should read something like 12:07 if it were there right "now" in the ships frame as opposed to noon in clock A's frame?