Are My Partial Derivatives Correct in Finding the Equations of Motion?

Maybe_Memorie
Messages
346
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find equations of motion (eom) of a particle moving in a D-dimensional flat space with the following Lagrangian

L = (1/2)mv2i - k/ra,

r = root(x2i), m,k,a are constants

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



The equations of motion are given by d/dt(∂L/∂vi) - ∂L/∂xi = 0

So, when I work all this out I get
ma = ka/xia+1

I have a feeling this isn;t correct though.

Am I doing the partials wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you're taking the partial with respect to xi incorrectly. Try writing out the potential term in terms of the xi's and differentiating.

Also why is a multiplying m? How did the exponent of r get over there?
 
vela said:
Yes, you're taking the partial with respect to xi incorrectly. Try writing out the potential term in terms of the xi's and differentiating.

Also why is a multiplying m? How did the exponent of r get over there?

U = k/ra = k/root(x2i)a
= k/xai
= kx-ai

Differentiating this with respect to xi gives -akx-a-1


As for the last part; sorry, when I wrote a on the LHS I was referring to the second derivative of xi w.r.t. time
 
Maybe_Memorie said:
U = k/ra = k/root(x2i)a
= k/xai
= kx-ai

Differentiating this with respect to xi gives -akx-a-1
How are you going from k/root(x2i)a to k/xai?

Are you saying, for instance, that \sqrt{x_1^2+x_2^2} = x_1+x_2?

EDIT: Oh, I see why we're getting different answers. I think there's an implied summation: r=\sqrt{x_i^2} = \sqrt{x_i x_i} = \sqrt{\sum_i x_i^2}
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top