Atwood Machine: Find M in Terms of m1 & m2

AI Thread Summary
To determine the mass M in an Atwood machine so that it remains stationary, the relationship between M, m1, and m2 must be established. The tension in the rope, T1, is equal to Mg, while T2 is derived from the forces acting on m1 and m2. The equations T2 - m1g = m1a and T2 - m2g = -m2a are combined to express T2 in terms of m1 and m2. By substituting T1 = 2T2 into the equation, M can be expressed as M = [m1(g + a) + m2(g - a)] / g. The challenge lies in eliminating g and a to express M solely in terms of m1 and m2, which requires solving the linear equations for T2 and a.
Ryan95
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In the Atwood’s machine, what should M be, in terms of m1 and m2, so that it doesn’t move?
atwood.JPG


Homework Equations


F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution


I've set T1=Mg as T1 is the tension of the rope attached to M. m1 and m2 are both connected together by the same rope so I assumed T1=2T2 .
I set up the equations
T2-m1g=m1a
T2-m2g=-m2a (negative due to m1 and m2 moving in opposite directions).
I then added the two together to get
T2=[m1(g+a)+m2(g-a)]/2.
Which, since T1=2T2=Mg, it can be expressed as
M=[m1(g+a)+m2(g-a)]/g (I think).
Which is where I'm stuck now. I'm unsure of how to get rid of g and a in order to have my answer in terms of just m1 and m2. It's probably pretty simple, but I can't quite get it.. It seems as g can be canceled out from the current equation, but I'm not sure about a.
I've tried canceling out the g and then solving for a which gives me
a=M/m1-m2
But upon plugging that in as a, I am unsure of how to proceed.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Please either describe the set-up or post a diagram. Not all Atwood's machines are the same.
 
Right, apologies. I've added a photo.
 
You have 2 linear algebraic equations in two unknowns, T2 and a. Solve for them separately.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top