Atwood Machine: Find M in Terms of m1 & m2

AI Thread Summary
To determine the mass M in an Atwood machine so that it remains stationary, the relationship between M, m1, and m2 must be established. The tension in the rope, T1, is equal to Mg, while T2 is derived from the forces acting on m1 and m2. The equations T2 - m1g = m1a and T2 - m2g = -m2a are combined to express T2 in terms of m1 and m2. By substituting T1 = 2T2 into the equation, M can be expressed as M = [m1(g + a) + m2(g - a)] / g. The challenge lies in eliminating g and a to express M solely in terms of m1 and m2, which requires solving the linear equations for T2 and a.
Ryan95
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In the Atwood’s machine, what should M be, in terms of m1 and m2, so that it doesn’t move?
atwood.JPG


Homework Equations


F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution


I've set T1=Mg as T1 is the tension of the rope attached to M. m1 and m2 are both connected together by the same rope so I assumed T1=2T2 .
I set up the equations
T2-m1g=m1a
T2-m2g=-m2a (negative due to m1 and m2 moving in opposite directions).
I then added the two together to get
T2=[m1(g+a)+m2(g-a)]/2.
Which, since T1=2T2=Mg, it can be expressed as
M=[m1(g+a)+m2(g-a)]/g (I think).
Which is where I'm stuck now. I'm unsure of how to get rid of g and a in order to have my answer in terms of just m1 and m2. It's probably pretty simple, but I can't quite get it.. It seems as g can be canceled out from the current equation, but I'm not sure about a.
I've tried canceling out the g and then solving for a which gives me
a=M/m1-m2
But upon plugging that in as a, I am unsure of how to proceed.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Please either describe the set-up or post a diagram. Not all Atwood's machines are the same.
 
Right, apologies. I've added a photo.
 
You have 2 linear algebraic equations in two unknowns, T2 and a. Solve for them separately.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top