Boyle's law pressure calculation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the pressure increase in an inflated pillow when a weight is placed on it. The initial pressure in the pillow is 1033 hPa, and the weight of 10 kg generates a force that affects the pressure distribution within the pillow. The calculation provided estimates the pressure increase to be 3270 Pa based on the force exerted over a given surface area. However, complexities arise due to the pillow's shape and curvature, which complicate the pressure modeling. The geometry of the problem is not accurately represented, leading to further challenges in deriving a precise solution.
Daan van Driel
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An pillow is inflated with an pressure of let's say 20 hPa. Afterwards we place a weight of 10 Kg on the pillow, what is the pressure increase within the pillow?

P athmosthere = 1013 hPa
P cushion = 1013 + 20 = 1033 hPa
m = 10 Kg
g = 9.81 m/s^2

Amount of air in the pillow stays the same

Homework Equations


[/B]
Boyle's law: P1 * V1 = P2 * V2
Gravitational force: F = m * g
Pressure: P = F / A

The Attempt at a Solution

pressure-calc-illustration.png

[/B]
The added weight creates a force F. This creates an apposing force within the pillow (Newton's third law) which is devided over the enitre inner surface of the pillow. Therefore P = F / A = m * g / A.

Lets assume that the surface area of the pillow is equal to 300 cm^2. P = (10 * 9.81) / 0.03 = 3270

Would this be right? If so, how do I translate this 3270 back to the pressure difference between P2 ane P3?
 

Attachments

  • pressure-calc-illustration.png
    pressure-calc-illustration.png
    7.1 KB · Views: 540
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this an actual homework problem? Is the geometry exactly as you have shown it in the figure?
 
Chestermiller said:
Is this an actual homework problem? Is the geometry exactly as you have shown it in the figure?

No, this is a problem I'm trying to answer for a project. The geometry is not exactly as it is shown in the picture, i just made it to substantiate my explanation.
 
Daan van Driel said:
No, this is a problem I'm trying to answer for a project. The geometry is not exactly as it is shown in the picture, i just made it to substantiate my explanation.
This is a pretty complicated problem, since the shape and curvature of your surface changes. You also omitted the force on the other side of the cushion required to hold it in place. It might be possible to model this more easily if the cushion were sandwiched between two infinite flat surfaces, but that too would be somewhat complicated. If the outer boundary of the cushion were considered inextensible, then pressing it between flat surfaces (or any other surfaces for that matter) would cause the boundary to buckle and form folds.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top