C is incorrect. Work and Friction: A, B, & D True

  • Thread starter Thread starter brake4country
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction Work
AI Thread Summary
Statements A, B, and D are identified as incorrect, while C is deemed correct despite initial confusion. Friction is a non-conservative force that converts useful energy into less useful forms, but energy is still conserved overall. The discussion highlights that heat transfer can occur without friction, as seen in processes like PV work. The importance of understanding the distinction between conservative and non-conservative forces is emphasized, as neglecting details can lead to misunderstandings. Overall, the conversation clarifies misconceptions about work, energy, and heat in physics.
brake4country
Messages
216
Reaction score
7
Which of the following statements are true?
(A) No work is done on an object if that object remains stationary
(B) Work can only change the velocity or position of an object and not its temperature
(C) Energy is conserved when frictional forces are applied to an object
(D) Energy transfer as heat always accompanies friction

3. The Attempt at a Solution

I understand how A, B, and D are incorrect but I cannot figure out how C is correct. My reasoning is that friction is a nonconservative force, therefore, how can energy be conserved when friction is involved?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Energy is always conserved. What friction does is that it converts the "useful" form of energy (say kinetic energy) into "not useful" form of energy (which may be the dissipated heat, or the kinetic energy of air molecules). You cannot create or destroy energy. If a force is non-conservative, it simply means that the work done by that force will be dependent on the path taken by the object on which that force is acting, contrary to conservative forces whose work doesn't depend on the path taken by the object.
 
Ok. I understand now. A is wrong because a stationary object we may be neglecting PV work or some other type of energy on the system. B is wrong because an increase in internal energy will raise the temperature of object, and D is completely wrong because in the example of PV work, compression of a real gas will raise internal energy which can dissipate out into the environment without the use of friction.
 
Yes you are right. And all your explanations are correct.
However I am having a feeling that you are considering "heat" to be something that is of no important? Heat is just a way to transfer energy at the system boundary. It is not necessary that it always gets dissipated in the surrounding. Consider this, when you heat water, it gets converted to steam which can be used to run a turbine to produce electricity (that is what we do at a thermal power plant). So heat is always to be dissipated in the environment.
 
Thank you for the reply. Actually, I gave the example of heat transfer only as an example even though heat has broad applications. I think my confusion was the difference between conservative and non-conservative forces. There are many details in physics that when ignored can backfire when you don't fully understand. Thanks for answering my question!
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top