Calculate net charge with nonuniform electric field

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion centers around calculating the net charge within a cubical volume subjected to a nonuniform electric field. The electric field is defined by a specific formula involving parameters such as E0 and a, with the cube's sides aligned to the coordinate axes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to calculate the net electric flux through the cube's six faces to determine the enclosed charge. There are attempts to evaluate the integrals for the flux calculations, with some questioning the cancellation of flux values for opposing faces. Others raise concerns about the units and the integration limits.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the evaluation of integrals and the correct application of the electric flux formula. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of the electric field's uniformity across certain dimensions and the correct setup for the integrals.

Contextual Notes

Participants note confusion regarding the integration process and the application of the electric field in relation to the cube's dimensions. There is also mention of potential errors in unit consistency and the need to integrate over different variables for specific faces of the cube.

ooohffff
Messages
74
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


In a cubical volume, 1.05 m on a side, the electric field is given by the formula below, where E0 = 1.25 N/C and a = 1.05 m.

boldE.gif
= E0(1 + z/a) i + E0(z/a) j

The cube has its sides parallel to the coordinate axes, see the figure. Determine the net charge within the cube.

22-43.gif

Homework Equations



φe = ∫E⋅dA = qenc0

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
So I know that I need to calculate the net flux through all the 6 faces of the cube in order to solve for qenc. I know that φ+z and φ-z are equal to 0.

I think I am doing something wrong because it seems like they would cancel out?

φ+x = E0 a2 ∫ (1+z/a) dz
φ-x = -E0 a2 ∫ (1+z/a) dz
φ+y = E0 a2 ∫ (z/a) dz
φ-y = -E0 a2 ∫ (z/a) dz

Also, I would evaluate the integrals from 0 to a right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ooohffff said:

Homework Statement


In a cubical volume, 1.05 m on a side, the electric field is given by the formula below, where E0 = 1.25 N/C and a = 1.05 m.

boldE.gif
= E0(1 + z/a) i + E0(z/a) j

The cube has its sides parallel to the coordinate axes, see the figure. Determine the net charge within the cube.

22-43.gif

Homework Equations



φe = ∫E⋅dA = qenc0

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
So I know that I need to calculate the net flux through all the 6 faces of the cube in order to solve for qenc. I know that φ+z and φ-z are equal to 0.

I think I am doing something wrong because it seems like they would cancel out?

φ+x = E0 a2 ∫ (1+z/a) dz
φ-x = -E0 a2 ∫ (1+z/a) dz
φ+y = E0 a2 ∫ (z/a) dz
φ-y = -E0 a2 ∫ (z/a) dz

Also, I would evaluate the integrals from 0 to a right?
You have done a lot correct.

The units will be wrong.

Where does a2 come from ?
 
Hello!

ooohffff said:
I would evaluate the integrals from 0 to a right?
Yes.
ooohffff said:
I think I am doing something wrong because it seems like they would cancel out?
You don't think this is possible? Notice that for a particular ##z##, ##E## remains constant throughout the object. Also, what is the definition of flux?
 
SammyS said:
You have done a lot correct.

The units will be wrong.

Where does a2 come from ?

I think I was getting confused between ∫ E⋅dA and E⋅A, but since I'm doing the integral one then I don't need a2. So,

φ+x = E0 ∫ (1+z/a) dz
φ-x = -E0 ∫ (1+z/a) dz
φ+y = E0 ∫ (z/a) dz
φ-y = -E0 ∫ (z/a) dz

from 0 to a.
 
ooohffff said:
I think I was getting confused between ∫ E⋅dA and E⋅A, but since I'm doing the integral one then I don't need a2. So,

φ+x = E0 ∫ (1+z/a) dz
φ-x = -E0 ∫ (1+z/a) dz
φ+y = E0 ∫ (z/a) dz
φ-y = -E0 ∫ (z/a) dz

from 0 to a.
The units are also incorrect this time.

You need to integrate over y for some & over x for others. Since E is independent of x & y the result of those is easy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
971
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K