Calculating Electric Field on Skin Surface with Decibels - Homework Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter tamtam402
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decibels
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field E1 at a depth of 1 cm into the skin, given the surface electric field E0 and a loss in decibels. The confusion arises between using 10log and 20log in the equations for decibels. The user initially applies 10log, leading to a calculated value of k, but the teacher uses 20log, resulting in a different k value. The user questions whether 20log should be used, arguing that it should already account for the power density loss without needing to square the ratio. Ultimately, clarity on the appropriate logarithmic approach is sought to resolve the discrepancy in calculations.
tamtam402
Messages
199
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let E1 be the electric field 1cm into a person's skin and E0 be the electric field on the surface of that person's skin. If the field loses -486db/m and E0 = 64.1, find the value of E1.


Homework Equations



E1/E0 = k, with k < 1


The Attempt at a Solution



Well I'm mostly confused about the use of 20log vs 10log. My solution is:

We have -486dB/m, or -4.86dB/cm.

10log(E1) = 10log(k) + 10log(E0), where 10log(k) must be negative since k < 1.

We know that 10log(k) = -4.68, thus k = 10^(-4.68/10) = 0.3404

However, my teacher wrote the following equation:
20log(E1) = 20log(k) + 20log(E0)

Which gives a different value of k, obviously. I thought decibels were always 10log(ratio), and the only reason why 20log(ratio) sometimes appear is when you have a ratio of squared values, such as 10log(P1/P2) = 10log([V1^2/R]/[V2^2/r]) = 10log(V1^2/V2^2) = 20log(V1/V2) in electronics.

I'd like to know if 10log or 20log should be used in this situation. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One more thing. Would I be right to assume that using the 20log equations give the ratio k of power density loss that corresponds to the electric field loss? I ask this because the teacher uses his ratio k that he found with the 20log equations, then argues that since P1/P0 = E1^2/E0^2, the ratio of P1/P2 = k^2... I thought that using 20log would already give the "correct k" for the P1/P0 ratio without needing to square it.
 
You've basically said it yourself:
$$10\ \log\, \left( \frac{P_1}{P_2} \right) = 10\ \log\, \left( \frac{E_1^2}{E_2^2} \right) = 20\ \log\, \left( \frac{E_1}{E_2} \right). $$
You are using field strength in this problem, so ##\ldots##
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...

Similar threads

Back
Top