Calculating Electric Field Using Coulomb's Law

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field using Coulomb's Law, specifically addressing the components Ey and Ex. The participant calculates Ey as 1.523E-16 N/C by summing the contributions from various charges, noting that the x-components cancel out. There is confusion regarding the use of the formula and constants, particularly the factors of 1/k and sqrt(2). The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between force and electric field, clarifying that the test charge cancels out in the field calculation. Resources from HyperPhysics are suggested for further clarification on the topic.
Jrlinton
Messages
133
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


electri field.PNG


Homework Equations



Ex=1/k*1/(a^2/2)*1/(sqrt2)*cos(theta)*(sum of charges)
Ey=1/k*1/(a^2/2)*1/(sqrt2)*sin(theta)*(sum of charges)

The Attempt at a Solution


So first off I can see that I don't need to calculate the force in the x direction as each q cancels out when arranged appropriately
For Ey I get:
Ey=1/k*1/(.067^2*2)*1/sqrt2*sin(45degrees)*(-6.31nC+18.6nC+18.6nC-6.31nC)*10^-9
=1.523E-16 N/C

Use Pythagorean theorem but that is unnecessary do to an absence of an x component
 
Physics news on Phys.org
just go "by parts" try finding y comp of charge 1 and 4 then 2 and 3 and just add them up. or realize that charges 1 and 2 resultant y component is the same as 3 and 4 so you just have to do one calculation and multiply by 2
 
I did as you said using parts and still came up with the same answer of 1.523E-16 N/C.
1/k*1/(0.67^2*2)*1/sprt2*sin(45deg)*(-631nC+18.6nC)*10^-9
=7.61E-17
*2
=1.523E-16
 
Jrlinton said:
I did as you said using parts and still came up with the same answer of 1.523E-16 N/C.
1/k*1/(0.67^2*2)*1/sprt2*sin(45deg)*(-631nC+18.6nC)*10^-9
=7.61E-17
*2
=1.523E-16
that doesn't seem right... what are you using to calculate the field? E=F/qtest this q is normally a test charge (1C) and F = kQ*qtest/r2 so the test charge cancels out which makes sense since you want the field created by the source charge.
so Fx=Fcos(theta)
ps: r is the distance between the charge and the point where you are evaluating the field
ps2: yeah it doesn't seem to be a unit problem, i don't know where you got the 1/k or the sqrt2

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/elefor.html#c1
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/elefie.html
maybe those will help clearing things up
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top