Calculating Net Torque on Wheel Axle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the net torque on a wheel axle, given a friction torque opposing motion. The calculated torques from various forces result in a net torque of -1.4 N-m, indicating clockwise rotation. Participants debate the necessity of resolving forces into components, particularly questioning the use of -35N sin 135. The consensus suggests that understanding the tangential nature of forces is crucial for accurate torque calculations. Revisiting torque theory may clarify these concepts for better comprehension.
Jam51
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Calculate the net torque about the axle of the wheel shown in https://jigsaw.vitalsource.com/books/9781269392464/content/id/ch08fig39 . Assume that a friction torque of 0.40 m · N opposes the motion. Where F=18N (in photo).

The picture is here: http://www.webassign.net/giancoli/8-39alt.gif

Homework Equations


τ (tau) = rF

The Attempt at a Solution


Direction of the positive torque: counterclockwise direction

T1 = 28N*24cm = 6.72 N-m

T2 = -35N*12cm = -4.2 N-m

T3 = -18N*24cm = -4.32 N-m

Now you add all these torques

6.72 N-m -4.2 N-m -4.32 N-m = -1.8 N-m

Since I know the direction of rotation is clockwise, I added the friction torque to that result in the opposite direction:

-1.8 N-m +0.40 N-m = -1.4 N-m (clockwise)

This is the only way I was able to get the right answer. However, my first try was using -35Nsin135. Why do I not have to take the component of F in this example?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Aren't all the forces in the diagram, tangential?
And how did you arrive at -35Sin135 as the component?
 
That's where I was confused. I assumed it wouldn't be tangential because it was on the inside of the wheel.
 
Inside of the wheel? I don't really think that matters, it still has to be tangential, even if it's not, again, how did you arrive at -35 sin 135?
 
I was thinking that the F of 35N would have to be resolved into components and the only one being effective in producing rotational motion would be F sin θ. I'm pretty sure I'm just mixing up the theory behind torque.
 
That ##\theta## in ## \sin (\theta) ## is the angle which the force makes with the radius, in this case I don't thing 135 is that angle, hence I feel we should take it as a tangential force.
 
I definitely agree with that. I just have to revisit some of the theory so I'm not confusing concepts.
 
Back
Top