Calculating Power plant's electric output in relation to carnot efficiency

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a class problem involving the calculation of electric output for a nuclear plant operating at 80% Carnot efficiency. The key variables include the thermal input temperature of 540°F and the condenser temperature of 60°F, with confusion arising over the relevance of the river water temperatures. The optimal Carnot efficiency is calculated to be 48%, but due to inefficiencies in energy conversion, the actual electric output is estimated to be around 38.4% of the thermal output. Clarification is provided that the plant operates at 80% of the Carnot efficiency, not that the Carnot efficiency itself is 80%. Understanding these parameters is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
goldguy500
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
We were assigned a problem in class, but because it was on guest lecturer material, I am unclear of which given numbers and what equations to use. I do know I am supposed to use: η=TH-Tc/TH But I am confused as to why I have been given 4 variables ...Please Help!
Here is the question
[1] You are building a 3000 MW (thermal; i.e., the amount of heat the reactor makes) nuclear plant in India on a river in the foothills of the Himalayas with water temperature a constant 40°F (due to snow melt). After the river water is used in the plant condenser, it is returned at a temperature of 80°F. Assuming this plant operates at 80% carnot efficiency, what is the electric output at full power? Assume that the steam is 540°F and the condenser is at an average of 60°F.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Looking at the cycle and given data, what value would you assign to Tc ? What are the possibilities?
 
I was thinking 540 (converted to Kelvin) as Thot and 60 (in kelvin too as Tcold), but I am not sure what the other given numbers of river input temperature are for.
 
Check your numbers again. I do not see 540 Kelvin in the data. Remember:

K = C + 273
R = F + 460

Use K or R in efficiency calculations.
 
I think the problem statement means that this plant operates at 80% of the Carnot efficiency. (Not, "the Carnot efficiency is 80%").

edit: or is that obvious to you already?
 
gmax137 said:
I think the problem statement means that this plant operates at 80% of the Carnot efficiency. (Not, "the Carnot efficiency is 80%").

edit: or is that obvious to you already?

Exactly.
Optimal Carnot efficiency is (T(i)-T(c))/T(i), in in degrees K or R.

Using those numbers, the optimal efficiency of the plant is ((540+460)-(60+460))/(540+460)= 48%, which would be wonderful if achieved end to end. Unfortunately, the conversion to electric energy is sufficiently sloppy that electric energy produced is under 40% of the thermal output, barring heroic measures.
Using the 80% conversion efficiency would yield 38.4% overall, which is about state of the art.
 
Last edited:
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top