Calculating Tensile Strength of Stainless Steel Sample

AI Thread Summary
The tensile strength of the stainless steel sample is calculated correctly at 205 MPa, based on a maximum force of 410 N and a cross-sectional area of 2 mm². The rate of movement of the testing machine does not affect the tensile strength calculation, as tensile strength is independent of strain rate. Therefore, changing the force to account for the movement speed is unnecessary and incorrect. When considering material replacement, the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) should indeed be higher than the calculated tensile strength. The calculations and understanding presented are accurate.
123catty456
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello, Just want to check that I am calculating something correctly if this is ok;

I did a tensile test with some rectangular stainless steel samples and got the resulting max force reached for each sample.

if the max force experienced was 410N and the samples CSA is 2mm^2 then the tensile strength of that bar is (410/2) = 205N/mm^2 = 205MPa?


Heres were I was getting confused;

the zwick was moving at 10mm/min so just wondering if I was to change the max force experienced from 410N/10mm a minute to 4100N/mm a minute... and get a tensile strength of 4000/2 = 2050 MPa?
do I have to change anything to account for 10mm/min movement of the zwick? ... it doesn't look right...

If I am looking to replace this material I just need its UTS to be higher than this tensile strength value right?

thanks! :)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
123catty456 said:
Hello, Just want to check that I am calculating something correctly if this is ok;

I did a tensile test with some rectangular stainless steel samples and got the resulting max force reached for each sample.

if the max force experienced was 410N and the samples CSA is 2mm^2 then the tensile strength of that bar is (410/2) = 205N/mm^2 = 205MPa?


Heres were I was getting confused;

the zwick was moving at 10mm/min so just wondering if I was to change the max force experienced from 410N/10mm a minute to 4100N/mm a minute... and get a tensile strength of 4000/2 = 2050 MPa?
do I have to change anything to account for 10mm/min movement of the zwick? ... it doesn't look right...

If I am looking to replace this material I just need its UTS to be higher than this tensile strength value right?

thanks! :)
The tensile strength is independent of the rate of strain. You should also get the same stress-strain curve, irrespective of hwo fast the zwick is moving.
 
Hi Chestmermiller,

thank you for your reply, that's great I was just getting confused about that!

and so is the tensile strength of 205 N/mm^2 the correct answer then?

thanks :)
 
123catty456 said:
Hi Chestmermiller,

thank you for your reply, that's great I was just getting confused about that!

and so is the tensile strength of 205 N/mm^2 the correct answer then?

thanks :)
Yes.
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...
Back
Top