Calculating the Refraction Angle of a Light Ray Incident on a Prism

AI Thread Summary
A light ray incident on a prism with a 65° apex angle and a refractive index of 1.54 was analyzed to find the refraction angle. The base angles of the prism were calculated to be 57.5°, leading to an entry angle of 32.5° for the light ray. Using Snell's law, the relationship between the angles of incidence and refraction was established. The final calculated angle of refraction was found to be 55.8°. This solution illustrates the application of geometric principles and Snell's law in optics.
BioMechanical
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A light ray is incident on a prism whose apex angle is 65.0°. The ray is
incident at θa and leaves the prism with θa = θd. The refractive index of
the prism glass is 1.54.
Calculate θ



ans:55.8°

Homework Equations



n1sin\phi1=n2sin\phi2

The Attempt at a Solution



please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
prism.jpeg


See attachment before reading.

If the apex angle is 65 degrees, that means that our base angles are x = (180-65) / 2 = 57.5 degrees.

Now we know that the angle that the light enters the prism is equal to the angle that it leaves, this is another way of saying that the light travels parallel to the base of the prism. By simple trigonometry, we can determine angle θ2. Remember, θ2 is measured relative to the normal of incidence, N.(perpendicular to incident surface of prism).

θ2 = 90 - 57.5 = 32.5 degrees.

Once this is determined, we need to use Snell's law.

We've just found θ2 through geometry, and we're after θ1.

Regards,
Rob.
 
Last edited:
ohhh i get it. Thanks a lot.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top