Calculating Uncertainty in Scientific Measurements

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating uncertainty in scientific measurements for two parts: z = 5(ab/e) and p = 3e - b. In part 1, the relative uncertainty is calculated without considering the constant multiplier (5), leading to confusion about its role. The explanation clarifies that constants do not affect relative uncertainty, as they have zero uncertainty themselves. In part 2, the absolute uncertainty is calculated, where the constant (3) is included because it multiplies a measured value. Understanding the distinction between relative and absolute uncertainty is crucial for accurate calculations.
qorizon
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
a=12.26 +/- 0.08
b=0.25 +/- 0.05
e=1.2 +/- 0.2

Evaluate the uncertainty of following calculations

Part 1. z= 5(ab/e)

Part 2. p= 3e - b

The Attempt at a Solution


I attempted part 1 like this
Δz/z = 5 (Δa/a + Δb/b + Δe/e)
...
Calculated Δz to be 20 but the answer is
Δz/z = (Δa/a + Δb/b + Δe/e)
...
Δz = +/- 5 (to 1 sf)

Then I saw part 2's answer like this:
Δp = 3Δe + Δb
...
Δp= +/- 0.7 (to 1 sf)

Now I'm confused. Why is it that in part 1 the constant 5 in not taken into account when calculating uncertainty, but in part 2 the constant 3 is included? Am I doing it wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In part 2 you are computing an absolute uncertainty, so the absolute uncertainty on 3e is 3 times the absolute uncertainty on e.
In part 1 you are computing a relative uncertainty, so a constant doesn't matter.

Imagine (for part 1) that 5 is a measured value d, with d=5 +/- 0.
Then for the relative uncertainty of z we get:
Δz/z =(Δd/d + Δa/a + Δb/b + Δe/e)=(0+Δa/a + Δb/b + Δe/e) =(Δa/a + Δb/b + Δe/e)
A value with 0 uncertainty has no impact on the relative uncertainty, that's why you ignore multiplication by a constant when computing a relative uncertainty.

(http://web.uvic.ca/~jalexndr/192UncertRules.pdf)
 
Last edited:
Samy_A said:
In part 2 you are computing an absolute uncertainty, so the absolute uncertainty on 3e is 3 times the absolute uncertainty on e.
In part 1 you are computing a relative uncertainty, so a constant doesn't matter.

Imagine (for part 1) that 5 is a measured value d, with d=5 +/- 0.
Then for the relative uncertainty of z we get:
Δz/z =(Δd/d + Δa/a + Δb/b + Δe/e)=(0+Δa/a + Δb/b + Δe/e) =(Δa/a + Δb/b + Δe/e)
A value with 0 uncertainty has no impact on the relative uncertainty, that's why you ignore multiplication by a constant when computing a relative uncertainty.

(http://web.uvic.ca/~jalexndr/192UncertRules.pdf)

Thank you for the really helpful explanation!
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top