Can Atmospheric Pressure be Accurately Modeled at 300km Altitude?

  • Thread starter Thread starter s4177112
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Altitude Pressure
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating atmospheric pressure at altitudes up to 300 km, particularly for a vehicle detaching from a rocket during descent. The initial calculations are accurate up to 50 km using specific equations, but the user seeks guidance on modeling pressure and density beyond this altitude. It is noted that atmospheric pressure decreases rapidly with altitude, and above the stratosphere, conditions differ significantly, with minimal weather effects. The user has simplified the fluid dynamics for their project but acknowledges the complexity of real equations, suggesting that computational fluid dynamics may be necessary for precise modeling. Helpful resources and links to NASA's atmospheric measurements and models are provided to assist in further calculations.
s4177112
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
hi I'm new here and i need some help regarding atmospheric pressures.
i have a way of calculating it up until about 50 km above sea level.
is there a way to accurately model the pressure at an altitude up to 300km?
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Hi there, I hope I can be of assistance. i don't know how to model the pressure at an altitude up to 300 km. But remember that the pressure declines quite rapidly, I don't recall if it was an logarithmic scale proportional to the heigh above sea level, or perhaps an exponential scale, but above the stratosphere there is no weather (in the general terms we are accustomed to) and above the mesosphere you can pretty much say that you are in space, imo. Of course, it depends on how accurate you want the model to be, perhaps that is still of interest to your project.

I hope I helped, at least somewhat :P
 
thanks for your help.
i'll give you a bit more background to the problem.
i am actually trying to calculate the surface pressure of a vehicle that has been shot up in a rocket and detaches. it reaches a height of 300km and begins its descent. i have already modeled its velocity with python and wanted to do the same for the surface pressure for the entire trajectory.
i'm using the equation:

p-p1 = rho*v^2*sin^2theta

where p1 is the upstream pressure.
i have said that p1 is:

p1 = p0(1-(L*h/T0))^(g*M/R*L)
this only holds true up until 50 km.

all of this has been simplified down especially the fluid dynamics as the 'real' equations are far too complex and i think to solve it properly computation fluid dynamics is needed.

i am not sure what i should assume for altitudes above 50 km? i will also need to do the same with the density.
any ideas?
thanks again
 
Last edited:
thank you very much.
it is exactly what i needed.
 
Hello, I’m currently writing a series of essays on Pangaea, continental drift, and Earth’s geological cycles. While working on my research, I’ve come across some inconsistencies in the existing theories — for example, why the main pressure seems to have been concentrated in the northern polar regions. So I’m curious: is there any data or evidence suggesting that an external cosmic body (an asteroid, comet, or another massive object) could have influenced Earth’s geology in the distant...
Thread 'The Secrets of Prof. Verschure's Rosetta Stones'
(Edit: since the thread title was changed, this first sentence is too cryptic: the original title referred to a Tool song....) Besides being a favorite song by a favorite band, the thread title is a straightforward play on words. This summer, as a present to myself for being promoted, I purchased a collection of thin sections that I believe comprise the research materials of Prof. Rob Verschure, who at the time was faculty in the Geological Institute in Amsterdam. What changed this...
Back
Top