Can hull design prevent speedboats from flipping?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fahraynk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque
AI Thread Summary
Hull design plays a crucial role in preventing speedboats from flipping by managing the balance of forces acting on the boat. The torque produced by the motor can indeed cause the bow to rise, increasing the risk of flipping at high speeds. Factors such as hull water drag, hydrodynamic lift, air drag, and gravity must all be considered in achieving stability. Maintaining the right balance of these forces is essential for safe operation, especially in high-performance outboard hydros. Effective hull design contributes significantly to force management and overall boat stability.
fahraynk
Messages
185
Reaction score
6
If a speedboat has a motor that goes below the boat into the water, then shouldn't that motor produce a torque on the boat?
Shouldn't that torque cause the bow of the boat to rise? And the faster it goes, the more likely it will flip?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Google "angle of attack" and "resultant force."
 
Prop force vector (3D) is but one total force there are: hull water drag, hydrodynamic lift on planing surface, air drag and lift topside and below, gravity vector. All can be in or out of balance at steady top speed and while accelerating. In the outboard hydros I run there is a sensitive balance to keep it right side up. Hull design is a great part of success of force management.
 
  • Like
Likes Nik_2213, berkeman and Bystander
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top