Can Jet Engines Run on Hydrogen and Oxygen?

AI Thread Summary
Jet engines cannot run solely on hydrogen and oxygen as they are designed to operate with air, making such a configuration more akin to a rocket engine. While hydrogen can theoretically be used in jet engines, challenges arise from its cryogenic storage and the explosive nature of both hydrogen and pure oxygen. Scramjets, which have no moving parts, are better suited for hydrogen fuel. The SR-71 was initially designed to utilize hydrogen and air, highlighting the energy advantages but also the significant challenges related to density and storage. Overall, modifying a conventional jet engine for hydrogen and oxygen is impractical without specialized facilities.
Yapper
Messages
101
Reaction score
0
thinking of a project and was wondering can a jet engine be modified to run on just hydrogen and oxygen as the fuel, or is it too explosive? if not can a pulse jet?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
In theory a conventional jet engine could use hydrogen, but because it is normally stored in a cryogenic storage system, there are some difficulties.

Scramjets have been invision to run on hydrogen - no moving parts.
 
I think the first major thing to look at would be the amount of energy available from the ignition. Jet-A has a net heat of cumbustion of 43.2 MJ/kg. Also, H2 is not a gas that you want to play around with. Neither is pure O2 for that matter. Unless you have access to an explosion proof facility, I'd think of a different project.
 
No... you can't make a jet engine run on H2/O2... it wouldn't be a jet... it would be what we like to call a "rocket".

By definition, jets run on air... dumping a fuel and oxidizer together to combust is the definition of a rocket engine.
 
Yapper said:
thinking of a project and was wondering can a jet engine be modified to run on just hydrogen and oxygen as the fuel, or is it too explosive? if not can a pulse jet?
The SR-71, as originally conceived was to run on hydrogen and air. The biggest pro is, as Fred said, energy per unit mass, and the biggest con is density, not cryogenics (for the SR-71, anyway - for more mundane use, cryogenics would be an issue too). For the SR-71, cryogenics was a pro because the hydrogen could have been used to cool the airframe. The low density would have resulted in a 300 foot long plane.
 
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
I need some assistance with calculating hp requirements for moving a load. - The 4000lb load is resting on ball bearing rails so friction is effectively zero and will be covered by my added power contingencies. Load: 4000lbs Distance to travel: 10 meters. Time to Travel: 7.5 seconds Need to accelerate the load from a stop to a nominal speed then decelerate coming to a stop. My power delivery method will be a gearmotor driving a gear rack. - I suspect the pinion gear to be about 3-4in in...
Back
Top