Cantilever equilibrium problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the complexities of achieving both rotational and translational equilibrium in a cantilever beam. It highlights the necessity for the torques from the normal force and gravitational force to be equal for rotational equilibrium, while also emphasizing that the net forces must be zero for translational equilibrium. Participants explore the implications of treating the attachment point as both a force and a torque, clarifying that the torque from the attachment is independent of the net force. The conversation also addresses the concept of point forces and torques, discussing how they serve as useful approximations in analyzing the system. Ultimately, the thread underscores the intricate balance required for a cantilever beam to maintain equilibrium under various forces and torques.
  • #51
So is bending moment a force or a torque? Tension is a force if I understand correctly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
Neither. They are all stresses. The units for stress are the same as the units for pressure, but in solids they can point in directions other than perpendicular to the surface.
 
  • #53
So Tjoint is not a torque but a stress? How does it cancel out the other torques then?
 
  • #54
If you integrate a stress over an area you can get a torque or a force.

This is related to what we discussed earlier about the point force and point torque approximations.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top