Center (in y direction) of Mass of 3D pyramid

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the center of mass (ycm) for a pyramid-shaped monument made of stone blocks with a density of 3800 kg/m³. The monument's dimensions are 15.7 m in height, 64.8 m in width at the base, and 3.6 m in thickness. The initial attempt at calculating ycm resulted in an incorrect value of 7.85 m, which was later corrected to one-third of the height, aligning with the properties of triangular shapes. The key takeaway is that the formulas used for length and width must account for the monument's geometry accurately.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of center of mass calculations
  • Familiarity with integration techniques in calculus
  • Knowledge of geometric properties of pyramids and triangles
  • Basic principles of density and volume calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the center of mass for triangular prisms
  • Learn about integration methods for calculating volumes of solids
  • Explore the implications of density variations in solid objects
  • Review examples of similar problems involving pyramids and their properties
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering courses, educators teaching calculus and geometry, and anyone involved in structural design or analysis of geometric shapes.

012anonymousx
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A monument is made from stone blocks of density 3800kg/m^3. The monument is 15.7m high, 64.8m wide at the base, and 3.6m thick from front th back. How much work was required to build the monument? (Hint: find ycm).

Homework Equations



ycm = (1/M) * ∫ydm, M = mass total

The Attempt at a Solution



Take a cross section and get a rectangle.
The length will be: (64.8/15.7) * y
The width will be: (3.6/15.7) * y

Thus, dm = density * length * width * dy

M total = density * volume = 6958742.8

ycm = (1/M) * ∫y * density * length * width * dy (from 0 to 15.7)

Okay, so this solution is wrong. It gives the the ycm as 7.85m. But ycm is actually a third of the height (as it is for triangles).

My question is: what is fundamentally wrong with my approach?

I have the solution though. I don't need that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your formulas for the length and width have them both zero for y = 0. Unless the monument is supposed to be standing on its head, that could be problematical :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
That shouldn't matter.

Take the center of mass from 7.85m from the top.

Interestingly. 7.85m is the middle of the triangle.
 
Got it got it got it! 3.6 is constant. Brb

[EDIT] Works. You made me think of it. I was looking at integrating from the top and wrote out eqn to reverse and realized... wait a minute, I'm scaling the width but its constant...

TYVM.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K