Change of variable integral problem

NewtonianAlch
Messages
453
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://img716.imageshack.us/img716/7453/28042782.jpg

The Attempt at a Solution



What I do not understand is how the Jacobian suddenly gets inverted when doing the integral, I have looked over my other tutorial problems for similar solutions and I do not recall doing something like this.

http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/7459/45340834.jpg
http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/7548/63185150.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The Jacobian calculated in the solution is
$$J = \begin{vmatrix}
\partial u/\partial x & \partial u/\partial y \\
\partial v/\partial x & \partial v/\partial y
\end{vmatrix}$$ so you have that ##du\,dv = J\,dx\,dy##. Because you want to find ##\int dx\,dy##, you need to integrate ##\int (1/J)\,du\,dv##. If you used the inverse transformations and found instead
$$J' = \begin{vmatrix}
\partial x/\partial u & \partial x/\partial v \\
\partial y/\partial u & \partial y/\partial v
\end{vmatrix},$$ then you'd have ##dx\,dy = J'\,du\,dv##.
 
Yes, it looks like velas response is correct, but let me add a notation that might help you remember which way you are going. There is a visual believability about

dudv=|\frac{\partial(u,v)}{\partial(x,y)}|dxdy

and so also for

dxdy=|\frac{\partial(x,y)}{\partial(u,v)}|dudv

See? It sort of looks like things cancel correctly.
 
Last edited:
algebrat said:
Yes, it looks like velas response is correct, ...

vela has a history of giving correct responses!
 
Thanks for the responses, yea I sort of see it now. I guess a bit more practice with it is required.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top