Coefficient of static friction calculation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the coefficient of static friction for a box on a horizontal plane, given its mass and dimensions. The initial approach incorrectly equated torque and force, leading to an erroneous value for the coefficient. After clarifying the relationship between the forces and torques at the tipping point, a revised equation was suggested, resulting in a more accurate estimate of approximately 0.35. Additionally, testing on an angled surface yielded a coefficient of static friction of 0.32, consistent with the findings from the horizontal test. The importance of correctly distinguishing between forces and torques in these calculations was emphasized throughout the conversation.
Tepictoc
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have a box on a horizontal plane.
Given data: mass = 0.25kg
height of object = 14 cm
width of object = 9cm
Calculate the coefficient of static friction.


Homework Equations


μs = Ff/N (N is the normalforce)
F = Ff = μ*N
mg = 2.45 Newton

The Attempt at a Solution


I apply an unknown force on the object from the left side at the height of x to see where it starts to tip over instead of slide. Looks like it's at 13 cm. x = 13

The vertical forces:
N cancels out mg since the object is not accelerating up or down, so N=mg.
μk is irrelevant in this case so I'll just write μ when I mean μs.

The horizontal forces:
Ff is acting in the opposite direction of the applied Force
F = Ff = μ*N
L is the length to the middle 4.5cm
mg*L - F*x = 0
I substitute in μ*mg instead where F*x is
mg*L - μ*mg = 0

This is where I think I might be going wrong:
μ = mg*L/mg
μ = L
Which would mean the coefficient of static friction is 4.5 or 0.45 which is too high.
When I angle (at 12 degrees) the same object on the same surface and calculate the μs it became 0.21


If I go this way it's slightly better but probably wrong since one m disappears:
μ = mg*L/g = 0.24
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm..
Remember that the forces that generally generate torques about the tipping point are:
The unknown horizontal force, gravity, and the normal force.
The frictional force act along the ground and generates no torque at all about the tipping point.

The box begins to tip when a) The normal force acts through the tipping point (generating no torque), and there is an equal, but opposite torque from the force F and gravity.

From this relation, you may determine F, and thus the coefficient for maximal static friction.

This equation "mg*L - μ*mg = 0" is dead wrong, your first term is a torque, the other a force

It should read mgL=(mu)*mg*x, that is: (mu)=L/x, roughly 0.35 by my reckoning.
 
arildno said:
Hmm..
Remember that the forces that generally generate torques about the tipping point are:
The unknown horizontal force, gravity, and the normal force.
The frictional force act along the ground and generates no torque at all about the tipping point.

The box begins to tip when a) The normal force acts through the tipping point (generating no torque), and there is an equal, but opposite torque from the force F and gravity.

From this relation, you may determine F, and thus the coefficient for maximal static friction.

This equation "mg*L - μ*mg = 0" is dead wrong, your first term is a torque, the other a force

It should read mgL=(mu)*mg*x, that is: (mu)=L/x, roughly 0.35 by my reckoning.

Thanks a lot, that helps me.
The equation "mg*L - μ*mg = 0" was what my teacher wrote down for me when he was trying to help. First we have
mg*L - F*x = 0
and as mentioned earlier F = Ff = μ*N and N=mg
that's how I got the "dead wrong equation". He was using it to separate μ.
 
It is unfortunate that your teacher made that silly mistake. It is easy to do this sort of thing, and should not be held against him (unless he has a general tendency to mix up forces and torques)

F*x=(mu)mg*x, agreed?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
arildno said:
It is unfortunate that your teacher made that silly mistake. It is easy to do this sort of thing, and should not be held against him (unless he has a general tendency to mix up forces and torques)

F*x=(mu)mg*x, agreed?

Agreed.
I did some testing and I would get the same μs on the angled surface test as in the horizontal test if I applied the force at 14 cm. That is μs = 0.32
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top