Coin Rolling Up Incline, no mass given?

AI Thread Summary
A coin with a diameter of 3.40 cm rolls up a 27.0° incline starting at an angular speed of 55.0 rad/s, but the problem lacks mass information. The initial approach using mass in the formula for acceleration is ineffective since mass is not provided. Instead, potential energy and angular kinetic energy should be utilized, with mass canceling out in the calculations. The initial kinetic energy must account for both rotational and translational components. The correct moment of inertia for the coin needs to be applied to accurately solve for the distance rolled up the incline.
splinter
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Coin Rolling Up Incline, no mass given!?

1. [SFHS99 8.P.46.] A coin with a diameter of 3.40 cm rolls up a 27.0° inclined plane. The coin starts with an initial angular speed of 55.0 rad/s and rolls in a straight line without slipping. How far does it roll up the inclined plane?

Having some troubles with this problem, since it doesn't give the mass of the object. I have no problems doing this type of problem when a mass is given, I just use the formula a = (mg sin0)/(m+(I/R^2)), then convert that to angular acceleration, and use angular kinematic equations to find the delta theta, and convert that into a meter value by multiplying the radius by the angular displacement. That doesn't work here though, since I have no mass! Any help would be greatly appreciated, thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to use potential energy and angular kinetic energy to get the answer. Don't worry about the mass, it'll be canceled in the end of your calculation.
 
Used KEi = PEf, solved for KEi and PEf, got KEi = .2186M, and PEf = 9.81MH. Since KEi = PEf, .2186M = 9.81MH, the mass on each side cancel out, so .2186 = 9.81H, then solve for H, i got .0223 meters, then divide that by sin(27) to get the value of the hypotenuse, which gave me .0491 meters for my answer, which the online homework is telling me is wrong! Sorry if this didn't make much sense I'm rushed in typing it.
 
Don't forget that the coin has more than just rotational kinetic energy in the beginning. It also has some translational kinetic energy in the beginning.

--J
 
Your KEi is wrong. The I should be 1/2mr^2+mr^2
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top