Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 9,747
- 11,967
fresh_42 said:Too bad that 1611992 is too short.
I tried working out several variations. assuming you were also using the periodic table ....
I couldnt conclude which were single digits and which were double digits
1 6 11 9 92
H C Na F U
16 11 9 92
16 11 99 2
probably something totally different ???