Confused About Where to Begin? Start Here!

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between polarization, magnetization, and the vector fields D, E, B, and H. The equations D = εE and H = (1/μ)B are central, with ε and μ expressed in terms of their vacuum values and susceptibility. The user successfully derives expressions for polarization and magnetization, confirming the use of ε₀ and μ₀ instead of susceptibility terms. They also arrive at key equations for divergence and curl involving electric and magnetic fields. Overall, the user demonstrates a solid understanding of the concepts and equations related to electromagnetic fields.
ParticleGinger6
Messages
32
Reaction score
5
New user has been reminded to show their work on schoolwork questions
Homework Statement
Maxwell's Equation in matter reduces to Maxwell's equation in vacuum if polarization and magnetization are zero?
Relevant Equations
They can be found in the attached photo
I do not know where to start.
 

Attachments

  • Chegg 5.6.20.JPG
    Chegg 5.6.20.JPG
    33.5 KB · Views: 237
Physics news on Phys.org
How are polarization (i.e. the Polarization Vector Field) and magnetization (i.e. Magnetization Vector Field)\\ related to the vector fields \vec D , \vec E, \vec B, and \vec H?
 
@robphy so i found the equations D = epsilon*E and H = (1/mu)*H where epsilon = epsilon(not)*(1+Xe) and mu = mu(not)*(1+Xe). I think if I use that convert D into terms of P which would look like P = D - epsilon(not)*E and H = B/(mu(not)*(1+Xe)). From there you can get Magnetization from M = Xm*H

Am I on the right track
 
Yes... but use \epsilon_0 and \mu_0 instead of the \chis.
 
@robphy I believe I figured it out. So by using D = epsilon(not)E + P and H = B/mu(not) - M I was able to get to
dell * E = rou/epsilon(not) and dell cross B = mu(not)*J + mu(not)*epsilon(not)*(curly(d)*E/curly(d)t) for part a
Then for part b
I used P = epsilon(not)*X*E to get dell*E = rou/epsilon(not)
I used M = Xm*H to get dell cross B = mu(not)*J + mu(not)*epsilon(not)*(curly(d)*E/curly(d)t)
Both assuming mu approaches mu(not) and epsilon approaches epsilon(not)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top