Confused About Where to Begin? Start Here!

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between polarization, magnetization, and the vector fields D, E, B, and H. The equations D = εE and H = (1/μ)B are central, with ε and μ expressed in terms of their vacuum values and susceptibility. The user successfully derives expressions for polarization and magnetization, confirming the use of ε₀ and μ₀ instead of susceptibility terms. They also arrive at key equations for divergence and curl involving electric and magnetic fields. Overall, the user demonstrates a solid understanding of the concepts and equations related to electromagnetic fields.
ParticleGinger6
Messages
32
Reaction score
5
New user has been reminded to show their work on schoolwork questions
Homework Statement
Maxwell's Equation in matter reduces to Maxwell's equation in vacuum if polarization and magnetization are zero?
Relevant Equations
They can be found in the attached photo
I do not know where to start.
 

Attachments

  • Chegg 5.6.20.JPG
    Chegg 5.6.20.JPG
    33.5 KB · Views: 230
Physics news on Phys.org
How are polarization (i.e. the Polarization Vector Field) and magnetization (i.e. Magnetization Vector Field)\\ related to the vector fields \vec D , \vec E, \vec B, and \vec H?
 
@robphy so i found the equations D = epsilon*E and H = (1/mu)*H where epsilon = epsilon(not)*(1+Xe) and mu = mu(not)*(1+Xe). I think if I use that convert D into terms of P which would look like P = D - epsilon(not)*E and H = B/(mu(not)*(1+Xe)). From there you can get Magnetization from M = Xm*H

Am I on the right track
 
Yes... but use \epsilon_0 and \mu_0 instead of the \chis.
 
@robphy I believe I figured it out. So by using D = epsilon(not)E + P and H = B/mu(not) - M I was able to get to
dell * E = rou/epsilon(not) and dell cross B = mu(not)*J + mu(not)*epsilon(not)*(curly(d)*E/curly(d)t) for part a
Then for part b
I used P = epsilon(not)*X*E to get dell*E = rou/epsilon(not)
I used M = Xm*H to get dell cross B = mu(not)*J + mu(not)*epsilon(not)*(curly(d)*E/curly(d)t)
Both assuming mu approaches mu(not) and epsilon approaches epsilon(not)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top