Convert into polar coordinates

City88
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm trying to solve a double integral of a function which is bounded by the ellipse:
\frac{(x-2)^2}{16}} + \frac{(y-4)^2}{36}} = 1
And I can't figure out how to write this in polar coordinate form, and also what my bounds for theta and radius would be.

Homework Equations



I know that for a circle, the polar coordinates are
x=rcos(theta) and y=rsin(theta)
theta going from 0 to 2pi, and r going from o to a(being the radius)

The Attempt at a Solution



Well I know that an ellipse is not a circle! so I can't apply this formula without doing some tweaking. Can anyone help with this "tweaking"?

I have started by thinking it would be something like..
x=rcos(theta) + 2
y=rsin(theta) + 4
Because the ellipse is not in the center, but I can't figure out what else to do...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Probably the easiest thing to do is to make a change of variables, say u = x-2, v = y-4.
 
squashed circle

Hi City88! :smile:

(have a theta: θ and a pi: π :smile:)

I don't understand why you want to convert to polar coordinates. :confused:

Does this help? … An ellipse is a squashed circle, so you can represent it as x = a cosθ, y = b sinθ. :smile:
 
Even after doing that, I'm still stuck..

x-2 = u = rcos(theta)
y-4 = v = rsin(theta)

Wouldn't I still have to add (more like multiply) something to the rcos(t)? The radius still isn't circular because the u2 and v2's are divided by 42 and 62.
 
[Deleted]
 
City88 said:
Tiny-tim, my original question is …
City88 said:
M_{x}= \int \int\ y dx dy
<br /> M_{y}= \int \int\ x dx dy

Where the region is bounded by the ellipse:
\frac{(x-2)^2}{16}} + \frac{(y-4)^2}{36}} = 1

Hi City88! :smile:

You'd only convert to polar coordinates if your integrand was simpler in polar coordinates.

In this case, your integrand is either x or y which are obviously simpler in … x and y coordinates! :rolleyes:

Just integrate along strips of thickness dx or dy. :smile:
 
Yes, earlier I wrote
"This problem may be easier in polar coordinates."... but I was using 'may' in the sense that I had not really thought about it.
 
Thats what I first thought also...but then I realized the equation was just waaaay too messy for my liking. So then I figured polar coordinates may have to be used, since an ellipse sort of resembled a circle.

I just tried doing it again, but by keeping it in terms of x and y...and well it's messy!

for example, if I integrate with respect to x first, my bounds for that integral would be something like..

x goes from \pm 4\sqrt{1-\frac{(y-4)^{2}}{6^{2}}}+2

so is it just me, or does integrating over those bounds seem frightening? I feel as though there should be an easier way to do this. But I guess I'll just integrate this mess and try to make it work!
 
  • #10
messy bounds

City88 said:
… for example, if I integrate with respect to x first, my bounds for that integral would be something like..

x goes from \pm 4\sqrt{1-\frac{(y-4)^{2}}{6^{2}}}+2

so is it just me, or does integrating over those bounds seem frightening? I feel as though there should be an easier way to do this. But I guess I'll just integrate this mess and try to make it work!

Hi City88! :smile:

Messy bounds in the first integral don't matter, so long as the integrand is easy.

Of course, messy bounds in the first integral might make a messy integrand in the second integral …

so did it … ? :smile:
 
Back
Top