Studying Emissivity Effects on a Copper Box Experiment"

AI Thread Summary
The experiment involved a copper box with five metal rods to study the order in which pins dropped when hot water was added. The discussion centers on whether the emissivity of the rods affects the order of pin drop, considering that emissivity and thermal conductivity (k value) may influence heat transfer. It is concluded that emissivity does not significantly impact the results, as the energy lost through radiation is minimal compared to conduction. The Stefan-Boltzmann law supports this by showing that the energy loss due to radiation is negligible across a range of emissivities. Overall, the experiment suggests that thermal conductivity is the primary factor affecting the order of pin drop.
Sleve123
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The experiment we did was pretty basic, it was a copper box with five different metal rods (unlagged and of equal lengths and diameter) welded onto the bottom, on the bottom of each were pins stuck with petroleum jelly. Hot water was then added to the box and the order at which the pins dropped recorded.

I was wondering if the emissivity of the surface of the metal rods would have any major affects on the order, for example a metal may have a high emissivity and high k value (thermal conductivity) and may take longer than a low emissivity low k value metal rod. Giving you the impression that the first rod has a lower k value than the second, if you were to assume the time taken is only related to the k value of the metal.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Sleve123 said:
I was wondering if the emissivity of the surface of the metal rods would have any major affects on the order, for example a metal may have a high emissivity and high k value (thermal conductivity) and may take longer than a low emissivity low k value metal rod. Giving you the impression that the first rod has a lower k value than the second, if you were to assume the time taken is only related to the k value of the metal.
Emissivity is not a factor. You can calculate the energy lost by radiation due to the temperature difference between the rod and the surroundings over a broad range of possible emissivities (ie. apply the Stefan-Boltzmann law P = A\epsilon\sigma T^4) You will see that the amount of energy lost by radiation is insignificant.

AM
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top