DC Electric Motor Tourque/Power Usage

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the power and torque calculations necessary for building a six-wheel search and rescue robot using wheelchair motors. The original poster struggled with understanding the difference between static and kinetic coefficients of friction, which are crucial for determining the robot's acceleration and speed. Key points include the importance of zero-speed torque to overcome static friction and the need to measure rolling resistance for maintaining constant speed. Calculations provided show how to determine the power required for specific speeds and conditions, including climbing hills. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the significance of accurate calculations in robotics design for effective performance.
Sparkypedia
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
DC Electric Motor Torque/Power Usage

Hello Everybody,

I am mid way through doing an electronic engineering degree, I fancied as a summer project to build 6 wheel search and rescue robot. Idea being to use wheel chair motors to get the thing going. The problem is I am not an mechanical engineer, so am rusty with power and torque, coef of static friction etc. From what I remember from a-level physics I made the quick calculations shown in the image below:


Originally I tried do to this in metric...however after looking at a couple of sites it seems to only work in imperial and I was getting over 2000HP!

...now I think a 50HP car can manage a motorway, so I was expecting a low figure. This seems quite high? Can someone give me their take on this cheers!


[PLAIN]http://img841.imageshack.us/img841/321/robotpng.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
All the power is going to do is determine the acceleration. You need to look at the zero speed torque of the motor to determine if it will overcome the static friction, and then provided there is enough power, the motor and/or any gearing you use will determine the top speed.
 
Did you mean static coefficient or kinetic coefficient? The static coefficient only matters when the robot is stopped. Once the robot is moving the rolling resistance (kinetic coefficient) is what impedes motion.
 
This is where I show how little I know about such things, I thought the static coefficient was the force the robot had to overcome to change from being stationary to in motion. I presumed there would various other variables that would effect speed such as air-resistance etc. Honestly I know nothing about the kinetic co-efficient. All I am aiming for at the moment is to make a robot that can go 20kmph and pull 40kg. Once I have the thing built and working I will worry about packing it full of extra's.

I'm a fan of paintballing, I've played with programming wireless cameras before, my plan was to use a several PIC's. One to control the robots main locomotion, and one to possibly control an arm with a paintball gun attached and a camera ;) and a few different ideas in mind
 
The static coefficient applies UNTIL the object starts moving. Once the object is moving the amount of force required to maintain a constant speed is referred to as kinetic friction, or in the case of a wheeled vehicle, the rolling resistance.

Measuring the rolling resistance is simply using a force gauge to measure the force needed to maintain a known speed. In most cases of slow speed the rolling resistance remains constant, so simply find the force required to maintain ANY arbitrary constant speed. You could also calculate it based on the weight of the vehicle and the kinetic friction coefficient of the tires (if you have that information). By the way, air speed only applies at higher speeds as well.

Here's what you can do:
For the simple case you're working with you can easily find the force needed to maintain a constant speed, let's call it "f"

(Work) w=f*d (units in Joules (J)), d=20km=20000m for this example
(Power) P=w/t, (units in Watts (W)), t=1h=3600s for this example

so if f=1N, the power required by your robot to maintain 20kmph ON LEVEL GROUND is:
P(-)=(1N)*(20000m)/(3600s)=5.6W

That's on flat ground, and not including acceleration up to full speed. The negative sign is there because this power is a loss in the system (once you find the actual rolling resistance you can find the actual power loss).

Calculating the power required to overcome hills is more complicated, but not by much:

(Weight)=40kg*g=390N, the component the motors are required to overcome becomes:
F=390sin(angle of hill)
P=(F+f)*d/t - the power required to climb a certain distance vertically in a given amount of time

Say we want this to climb up a vertical wall at 20kmph (not necessarily practical but let's see what it looks like):
F=390N
f=1N
P(total)=391N*5.56J=2.2kW

The conversion from mechanical power to electrical power should be nearly 1:1, but I might be wrong.

Hope this helps!
 
Thats fantastic! really helped a lot, thank you very much! This is the first time I have used this forum, very impressed. I was wondering how to HorsePower compares to Power in watts, and you have answered that before I even asked. Cheers mate
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top