Degrees of Freedom for a Lagrangian System

Physkid12
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A long light inflexible rod is free to rotate in a vertical plane about a fixed point O. A particle of mass m is fixed to the rod at a point P a distance l from O. A second particle of mass m is free to move along the rod, and is attracted to the point O by an elastic force of strength k. The system is subject to gravity g. The constant k is given by k = mg/2l.

State the degrees of freedom and choose appropriate coordinates[/B]

Homework Equations



None[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution



I believe the degree of freedom is 2 with coordinates being θ: the angle of the rod and the distance of the second particle from the origin O. Although I am stuck on which coordinate I should use for that distance

Thanks![/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct about the number of degrees of freedom. It shouldn't really matter what you call the position of the second mass along the rod, as long as you identify what you mean. Just pick a variable name such as ##a## or ##r_2## and write a description next to it telling what it means or draw it on a diagram.
 
So would it be correct to use polar coordinates then?So then r would be the distance for the 2nd particle and it is related to the kinetic energy by x=rcosθ y=rsinθ and the first particle has fixed r=l?

Thanks for your swift response!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top