Deriving Electric Field at Origin for Infinite Line Charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the electric field at the origin due to an infinite line charge with a linear charge density that varies inversely with distance. The charge density is given by λ(x) = (λ0*x0)/x, leading to the need for integration from x0 to infinity to calculate the electric field. Participants clarify that the correct expression for the electric field involves integrating the charge density divided by the square of the distance, resulting in a factor of x^3 in the denominator. Misunderstandings about charge density and integration setup are addressed, emphasizing the importance of correctly associating variables in the integral. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the need for careful consideration of variable definitions and integration techniques in physics problems.
MrMaterial
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A line charge starts at x = +x0 and extends to positive infinity. The linear charge density varies inversely with distance from the origin, λ(x)=(λ0*x0)/x

derive the expression for the electric field at the origin, E0, due to this infinetly long line-charge (L→+∞)

Homework Equations



E = q/r^2

I think by "L" the professor mean x0.


The Attempt at a Solution



First thing I wanted to do was to draw the situation.

JZPX8.jpg


so the line charge i drew is a bit thick, but i made it big so it would be easier to show you guys how I am doing it.

I figure that every xi piece of the line charge makes a certain E field at the origin point which is x0 away. This is the way i usually solve these types of problems. However, this is the first time a varying charge density has entered the equation for me. Not only is the distance of the charge varying, but the amount of charge per xi is varying as well.

so every xi yields a certain q, which is a certain distance away from the origin which can be summed up with an integral from x0 to +∞. The q, or Δq, yielded would be xi*λi (distance * charge per distance) which will give me a charge value.

E0 =\int\frac{(\Delta q)}{\Delta x\stackrel{2}{}} dx \rightarrow \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon\stackrel{}{0}}\int\frac{((\lambda0*x0)/xi)*xi}{xi\stackrel{2}{}}dx

this seems to simplify to

E0 = ∫(λ0*x0)/x^2 dx since λ0*x0 is a constant, it turns into

E0 = \frac{(\lambda0*x0)}{4\pi\epsilon\stackrel{}{0}}\int\frac{dx}{x\stackrel{2}{}}

does this seem right to you guys? I get an evaluation of (λ0*x0)/(4(pi)ε0*x0) then the x0's cancel and i get a straight constant of λ0/(4(pi)ε0) as the Efield at the origin point.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


MrMaterial said:
A line charge starts at x = +x0 and extends to positive infinity. The linear charge density varies inversely with distance from the origin, λ(x)=(λ0*x0)/x

derive the expression for the electric field at the origin, E0, due to this infinitely long line-charge (L→+∞)

I think by "L" the professor mean x0.
No, L is the length. You can consider (if it helps) that the wire extends from x = x0 to x0+L, then let L tend to infinity.
I figure that every xi piece of the line charge makes a certain E field at the origin point which is x0 away.
No, it would be xi away.
so every xi yields a certain q, which is a certain distance away from the origin which can be summed up with an integral from x0 to +∞. The q, or Δq, yielded would be xi*λi (distance * charge per distance) which will give me a charge value.

E0 = ∫Δq/Δx^2 dx → 1/(4(pi)ε0)*∫(((λ0*x0)/x)*x)/x^2 dx
More accurately,
E0 = ∫dq/x^2 = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_{x_0}^{\infty}\frac{λ_0x_0 dx}{x}\frac{1}{x^2}
Note the denominator is x3, not x2.
 


haruspex said:
More accurately,
E0 = ∫dq/x^2 = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_{x_0}^{\infty}\frac{λ_0x_0 dx}{x}\frac{1}{x^2}
Note the denominator is x3, not x2.

ok this is the bit that confuses me.

here's what I did: E = \int\frac{((\lambda0*x0)/x)*x}{x^2} because (\lambda0*x0)/x is a density, and i need a charge, so i need to multiply by x. (x here meaning the xi) And to me that makes sense because that would be the charge value from the small piece of the line charge.

looking at my diagram, I have length xi and charge density λi. λi = (\lambda0*x0)/xi

can you please explain where i went wrong; how did you decide that dq was (\lambda0*x0)/x, not ((\lambda0*x0)/x)*x
 


MrMaterial said:
(\lambda0*x0)/x is a density, and i need a charge, so i need to multiply by x.
For an element dx with density ρ the charge is ρ.dx. I.e. the multiplication by length is already there in the integration process.
 


ok so i confused the density*dx with density*x. I'm going to have to think about that, for some reason i associated the same x with both the density and the distance. That scares me! :eek:

I am starting to remember that dx = Δx, but it seemed like there was another Δx for the distance. ugh, didn't think i'd forget how to set up an integral.

anyway thanks for helping! Looks like i got to do more integral practice
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top