Deriving equations for pressure & number density for centrif

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving equations for pressure and particle number density in a gas centrifuge, which separates gases based on molar mass through high-speed rotation. The user expresses confusion about how to approach the problem, particularly in drawing a free body diagram and understanding the expected form of the pressure equation. They mention a specific equation for number density, initially presented as nv = n0 * e^(m * r^2 * w^2 / (2 * k * T)), but later question its accuracy, suggesting it might be nv = n0 * e^(-m * r^2 * w^2 / (2 * k * T)) instead. The discussion highlights the need for clarity in applying Newton's second law to derive the required equations. Overall, the thread illustrates the challenges faced in understanding the physics behind gas centrifuges and the mathematical derivations involved.
issacweirdo
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider particles in a gas centrifuge. This device is used to separate gases of different molar mass by rotating a cylinder at high rates. Derive two equations: one for the pressure (P) and one for the particle number density (nv) as functions of M, r, w and T, where r is the radial distance from the center point and w is the angular frequency of the rotation. M and T are molar mass and temperature. Do this by applying Newton's 2^nd law to the circular motion of a segment of gas of mass delta(m) and width delta(r). Recall that centripetal acceleration is given by w^2 r and that the positive direction for r is radially outward from the center of the circle.

Homework Equations


nv = n0 * e\^(m * r^2 * w^2 / (2 * k * T))
Net Fr = (m * v^2)/r

The Attempt at a Solution


I have no clue what I'm supposed to do. I don't even know how I'm going to draw a FBD for this. I don't know what the pressure equation is supposed to look like, but I know the number density equation is supposed to look like this: nv = n0 * e\^(m * r^2 * w^2 / (2 * k * T)), where k is the Boltzmann constant. I only know this because I was able to look online for this answer (though it did not explain how they derived this).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Er, I mean nv = n0 * e^(m * r^2 * w^2 / (2 * k * T)). This part may also be wrong, since I think it should be nv = n0 * e^(-m * r^2 * w^2 / (2 * k * T)) since it reminds me of the Boltzmann factor.
 
Back
Top