Determining Reverse Mass Flow Rate Formula for Multiple Diameter Tubes

RealityMechanics
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
How would the mass flow rate equation in this scenario change if the flow is reversed?
Relevant Equations
See the image. A variation of Bernoulli's Equation.
Alright, this is more of a conceptual question than a HW question that will nonetheless help me design something. In the attached image, air is flowing through a large area tube and then a small area tube from right to left. A collaborator previously figured out the equation for measuring the flow rate in this way, which I placed beneath this diagram I made. I know this equation is correct because I tested out the measurements experimentally. In this image, the cylinders just represent the location of pressure sensors constantly logging the pressure at that location.
image.jpg

I would like to write another equation, however that represents the flow rate if instead, the air was sucked out from the right side. So essentially the air travels in reverse all the way from the open hole on the left to the right side of the tube. I attached an image I made representing this.
image.jpg

Here are a couple things I would like to point out that has been confusing me in figuring this out.
1. Pdiff is always going to be P1-P2 at any given instant. We do not know what P1 and P2 individually is. That's just the way the pressure sensor works.
2. The first equation was created from the perspective of the right hand side blowing air into the tube. I want this equation to still be from the same right side perspective, or something sucking the air out of the tube.
3. In the original scenario, Pdiff is always positive since P1 > P2. However, in this scenario I am trying to figure out, Pdiff is always going to be negative since P2 > P1. You cannot square root a negative. Perhaps, an absolute value is needed for Pdiff? Can we get these flow rates to be negative since the perspective is the same (right side) but now the air is being sucked out instead of blown in?

By the way, all horizontal measurements are symmetrical, if that matters. The length of both area tubes are the same, and the pressure sensors are equidistant from the ends of both area tubes and the center.

Any help will be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi @RealityMechanics. Welcome to PF. Since no one has yet replied, here are some comments...

I guess that you are treating air as incompressible and the flow as smooth (non-turbulent) - and that this is acceptable in the context you are working.

Your equation$$r = \sqrt {\frac {\frac {P_{diff}}{2 \rho_{air}}}{\frac 1{A_2^2} - \frac 1{A_1^2}}}$$is wrong. Check it dimensionally.

Once you understand the derivation of the correct equation, you should be able to work out what (if any) affect the direction of flow has on the parameters in the equation. You might like to remember that when ##r^2 = \text {some expression}##, then there are two possible values for ##r##.

Also, I’m not sure this should really be classified as “Advanced Physics Homework”. Maybe one of the Mentors will want to reclassify it.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Back
Top