How to Calculate the Electric Field at the Origin from a Uniformly Charged Rod?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the electric field at the origin from a uniformly charged rod, the x and y components of the electric field are derived using integration of the charge density. The equations for E_x and E_y involve integrating the charge element and applying geometric factors based on the rod's position. The computed values for E_x and E_y were found to be 1385 N/C and 1948 N/C, respectively, but there was uncertainty regarding their signs. It was suggested to consider the direction of the electric field produced by a positive point charge to determine the correct signs for the components. Proper evaluation of the signs is essential for accurate results in electric field calculations.
J6204
Messages
56
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



A line of charge with a uniform density of 34.2 nC/m lies along the line y = -14.9 cm, between the points with coordinates x = 0 and x = 42.8 cm. Calculate the electric field it creates at the origin, entering first the x component then the y component

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


E_x = 1/(4πε₀) ∫ λ dx * 1/ (Y² + x²) * x/((Y² + x²)^½

where Y is the vertical distance 14.9 cm.
λ dx is the charge element dq, 1/ (Y² + x²) is the " 1/r^2 " and x/((Y² + x²)^½ is the geometric factor for the x-component ("sin(α)" ).

Then the integral gives

E_x = λ/(8πε₀) ∫ du * 1/ u^(3/2)
= λ/(8πε₀) [-2/√u]
= λ/(4πε₀) (1/Y - 1/√(Y² + X²)) [where X = 42.8 cm] Along the same line of reasoning we have for the y-component

E_y = 1/(4πε₀) ∫ λ dx * 1/ (Y² + x²) * Y/((Y² + x²)^½
= Yλ/(4πε₀) ∫ dx /(Y² + x²)^(3/2)
= λ/(4πε₀) X/(Y√(Y² + X²)) When i substituted λ (34.2*10^-9 C/m), X ( 0.428 m ) and Y ( 0.149 m) and ε₀ ( 8.854 10^-12 F/m) to calculate Ex and Ey I got the following two numbers which were incorrect and I am not sure what I am doing wrong

Ex = 1385N/C
Ey = 1948N/C
 
Physics news on Phys.org
J6204 said:
Ex = 1385N/C
Ey = 1948N/C
Your approach looks good. I have not checked the numerical evaluation. But do you expect both components of E to be positive?
 
TSny said:
Your approach looks good. I have not checked the numerical evaluation. But do you expect both components of E to be positive?
I thought so, do the answers look correct besides one or two of them being negative? Did I need to factor in the negative sign on the y coordinate?
 
J6204 said:
I thought so, do the answers look correct besides one or two of them being negative?
Yes. To determine the signs of the components, choose an arbitrary point along the line of charge and treat the point as a positive point charge. Consider the direction of E at the origin produced by the point charge.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top