Electric field and potential outside and inside nonuniform spherical shell

krickette
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the electric field and potential inside and outside a hollow spherical shell (a \leq r \leq b) which carries a charge density proportional to the distance from the origin in the region, \rho=kr, for some constant k.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I think I've got the electric field inside the shell figured out, but I could be way off base. I have no idea how to do the rest...
help?

also, sorry, for some reason the <or= sign between a and r isn't working
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember Gauss' equation for the electric field: E=Q/(4pi e*r^2), where Q is the charge enclosed, pi=3.14159..., e* is a constant (the permittivity of free space), and r is the distance from the "center" of the charge distribution (analogous to center of mass). Inside the spherical shell (r<a<b), E=0 (no charge is enclosed). For a<r<b, the charge enclosed is obtained by integrating the charge density over the volume enclosed. In this case, the charge density is kr, and the differential element of volume is 4(pi)r^2 x incremental change in r (dr). This yields an enclosed charge of (pi)k(r^4-a^4), and substituting into Gauss' equation yields E=(k(r^4-a^4)/(4e*(r^2)). Outside the spherical shell, the enclosed charge is given by Q=(pi)k(b^4-a^4), and this yields E=(k(b^4-a^4))/(4e*(r^2)) for all r such that a<b<= r.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top