Electric field direction on a grounded conducting sphere

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the direction of the electric field on the surface of a grounded conducting sphere near a point charge. Using the method of images, the charge of the sphere is calculated as q' = -R/d * q, leading to the potential expression. The electric field is derived from the potential, revealing that the electric field components include both radial and angular components. However, upon further analysis, it is concluded that at the surface of the sphere, the electric field is purely radial, confirming that it does not make a 90° angle with the surface. The final expression for the electric field at the surface supports this conclusion, indicating it points only in the radial direction.
zapman345
Messages
11
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Is the angle that the electric field makes on the surface of a grounded conducting sphere near a (positive) point charge 90°? I.e. is the electric field pointed radially outward from the sphere.
Relevant Equations
##E=-\nabla V##
I am required to find the direction of the electric field on the surface of a grounded conducting sphere in the proximity of a point charge ##+q##. The distance between the center of the sphere and the point charge is ##d## and using the method of images we find that the charge of the sphere is ##q' = -\frac{R}{d}q## then we can calculate the potential which I found here:
$$V\left(\vec{r}\right) =\frac{q}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\left[\frac{1}{\sqrt{d^{2}+r^{2}-2dr\cos\left(\theta\right)}}-\frac{\frac{R}{d}}{\sqrt{\left(\frac{R^{2}}{d}\right)^{2}+r^{2}-2\left(\frac{R^{2}}{d}\right)r\cos\left(\theta\right)}}\right]$$
Now we also know that the electric field is:
\begin{align*}

E & =-\nabla V\\

& =-\left(\frac{\partial V}{\partial r}\hat{r}+\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial V}{\partial\theta}\hat{\theta}+\frac{1}{r\sin\left(\theta\right)}\frac{\partial V}{\partial\phi}\hat{\phi}\right)\\

& =-\left(\frac{\partial V}{\partial r}\hat{r}+\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial V}{\partial\theta}\hat{\theta}\right)\\

\end{align*}
Can I from this positively say that the electric field outside the sphere is not radially pointed outward only, and thus does not make a 90° angle with the surface of the sphere?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't you need to evaluate ##\frac{\partial V}{\partial\theta}## at r=R?
 
I did but that wouldn't make the ##\theta## component vanish cause I find that $$E_{\theta} = -\frac{1}{r}\cdot\left(\frac{rR^{3}\sin(\theta)}{d^{2}\left(\frac{R^{4}}{d^{2}}-\frac{2rR^{2}\cos(\theta)}{d}+r^{2}\right)^{3/2}}-\frac{dr\sin(\theta)}{\left(d^{2}-2dr\cos(\theta)+r^{2}\right)^{3/2}}\right)\hat{\theta}$$ Which even at ##r=R## doesn't vanish, it does vanish for ##\theta=0## but that is a trivial solution as that is the line directly between the real and fictive charge used in the method of images. For any ##\theta\neq0## this won't vanish but intuitively I think it should vanish because we're talking about a spherical object.
 
Consider the case R →∞ , you should recover the flat plane case for the potential. I think you need to worry about the angle for the image charge...you seem have a sign wrong.
 
You were right. The potential I had calculated should be $$
\begin{align*}

V\left(\vec{r}\right) & =\frac{q}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\left[\frac{1}{\sqrt{r^{2}+d^{2}-2dr\cos\left(\theta\right)}}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{R^{2}+\left(\frac{rd}{R}\right)^{2}-2dr\cos\left(\theta\right)}}\right]\\

\end{align*}$$
Then for the electric field you will find $$\begin{align*}
E & =-\frac{q}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\left\{ \left(\frac{2\left(\frac{d}{R}\right)^{2}r-2d\cos(\theta)}{2\left(R^{2}+\left(\frac{dr}{R}\right)^{2}-2ar\cos(\theta)\right)^{3/2}}+\frac{2r-2d\cos(\theta)}{2\left(r^{2}+d^{2}-2dr\cos(\theta)\right)^{3/2}}\right)\hat{r}+\frac{1}{r}\cdot\left(\frac{dr\sin\left(\theta\right)}{\left(R^{2}+\left(\frac{rd}{R}\right)^{2}-2dr\cos\left(\theta\right)\right)^{3/2}}-\frac{dr\sin\left(\theta\right)}{\left(r^{2}+d^{2}-2dr\cos\left(\theta\right)\right)^{3/2}}\right)\hat{\theta}\right\}

\end{align*}$$

Which reduces to
\begin{align*}

E\left(r=R\right) & =-\frac{q}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\left(\frac{d^{2}-R^{2}}{R\left(R^{2}+d^{2}-2dR\cos(\theta)\right)^{3/2}}\hat{r}+0\hat{\theta}\right)\\

& =-\frac{q}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\left(\frac{d^{2}-R^{2}}{R\left(R^{2}+d^{2}-2dR\cos(\theta)\right)^{3/2}}\right)\hat{r}

\end{align*}

Pointing only in the radial direction on the surface as expected. Thank you for all your help.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top