Electric field distribution inside a truncated cone

vinven7
Messages
58
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a truncated cone as shown in the figure. the material of the cone is a dielectric with top and bottom electrodes of different radii. Now a potential difference is applied across the capacitor - by connecting it to a battery - let's say. This creates an electric field distribution within the material inside the cone. How can we model the electric field distribution? If 'z' is the height from the bottom and r is the radial distance from the axis of the cone (parallel to the electrodes), what is the function E(z,r) at any point (z,r) within the cone?
Any ideas, suggestions, references, partial or full solutions will be greatly appreciated. Thanks


The Attempt at a Solution



To begin with, I am not sure if this sets up a uniform or a non - uniform electric field. I have read that the electric field lines have to be perpendicular to the electrodes as they are equipotential, and also that they have to parallel to the edges. By background is not in electrical sciences, so I am not even able to say if this is a simple or complicated problem.
 

Attachments

  • object_surfacearea_trunc_cone.png
    object_surfacearea_trunc_cone.png
    7.9 KB · Views: 683
Physics news on Phys.org
It is simple if you make some approximations, like (R-r) << h. It is hard and requires a two-dimensional simulation without that (or similar) assumption(s).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top