Electric field intensity at a distance

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating electric field intensity based on the power radiated by a bulb. It is noted that the power at a distance r is given by the formula Power radiated/4πr². A participant initially concludes that halving the power results in halving the intensity, leading to the incorrect assumption that E' equals E/2. The correction emphasizes that intensity is proportional to the square of the electric field, indicating that the relationship is not linear. This highlights the importance of understanding the quadratic relationship between intensity and electric field strength.
Jahnavi
Messages
848
Reaction score
102

Homework Statement


mcq2.jpg


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



The radiations from the bulb spread radially outwards such that "Power at a distance r" = Power radiated/4πr2 .

If distance is unchanged and power halved then the intensity should also be halved .

From this I get E' = E/2 .

But this is wrong .
 

Attachments

  • mcq2.jpg
    mcq2.jpg
    19.9 KB · Views: 742
Physics news on Phys.org
Jahnavi said:

Homework Statement


View attachment 217104

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



The radiations from the bulb spread radially outwards such that "Power at a distance r" = Power radiated/4πr2 .

If distance is unchanged and power halved then the intensity should also be halved .

From this I get E' = E/2 .

But this is wrong .
Intensity is propotional to square of elecric field
 
  • Like
Likes Jahnavi
Abhishek kumar said:
Intensity is propotional to square of elecric field

Thanks !
 
Jahnavi said:
Thanks !
Welcome
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top