Electric field lines between 20/30 V point charges vs. 10/0 V

AI Thread Summary
Electric field lines and equipotential lines between point charges with potentials of 20 V and 30 V will resemble those between charges at 0 V and 10 V, as only the difference in voltage affects the field lines. The discussion emphasizes that the absolute values of voltage are less significant than their differences when determining electric field behavior. Additionally, field lines will extend from the higher potential charge (10 V) to the lower potential charge (0 V), confirming the conventional direction of electric field lines. The potential due to a point charge approaches infinity as one gets closer to the charge, highlighting the importance of understanding the charge's characteristics. Overall, the relationship between voltage differences and electric field lines is crucial for analyzing these configurations.
miaou5
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What would the electric field lines / equipotential lines look like between point charges that are set up with potentials of 20 volts and 30 volts versus point charges that are set up with potentials of 0 volts and 10 volts?

The Attempt at a Solution



At first I thought the electric field lines would look different, but the more I thought about it, the more it seemed like they would be the same, since only the difference in V counts as opposed to the "absolute" values of V. Is this correct? Thank you all so much!

Added question: I completely forgot about this, but would the lines extend from the 10 V charge toward the 0 V? I know the lines go from the positive charge from the negative charge, so I'm pretty sure they would go from the higher V to the lower V, but I just wanted to make sure. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is true that only difference of voltage is important but remember the convention about voltage at infinitely far away. This is important for this problem.
 
Thank you so much!
 
hehe. no problem!
 
What is a point charge set up with a potential of 20 V ? :confused:

Since the potential due to a point charge is

\frac {1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac {Q}{r}

the potential near a point charge will become infinite for any non-zero charge.
If the point charge is merely a very small sphere, you still need to know the radius to get the charge from the potential.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top