Electric field stregth between charges

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field strength between two point charges and resolving discrepancies in answers. For a +60uC and -30uC charge 2.0m apart, the calculated electric field strength is 2.7x10^5 N/C towards the negative charge, which the book confirms as correct. However, when analyzing a similar problem with a 75uC and -25uC charge, the participant arrives at 4.5x10^5 N/C, while the book states the answer should be 9.0x10^5 N/C. The confusion arises from the treatment of negative signs in calculations, emphasizing that negative values indicate direction rather than magnitude. Ultimately, the correct approach involves treating the negative sign as a directional indicator when summing electric field strengths.
GRAvit__
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
1. What is the magnitude and direction of the electric field strength midway between a +60uC charge and a -30uC charge, if the charges are 2.0m apart?

2.E=kQ/r^2

3.
E1=Kx-30u/1
E2=-2.75x10^5

E2=kx60u/1
E2=5.4x10^5

Etotal=E1 + E2 ----> 2.7x10^5 N/C towards the - charge (my book says i have this right)

The problem that i have is that i came across a question that's almost the same but different answer.

1. What is the magnitude and direction of the electric field strength midway between a 75uC charge and a -25uC charge, if the charges are 2.0m apart?

Now i did everything the same as the first one and came to

E1=kx-25u/1
E1=-2.25x10^5

E2=kx75u/1
E2=6.75x10^5

Etotal=E1+E2 ----> 4.5x10^5 N/C towards the - charge (my book says its wrong)

Book answer : 9.0x10^5

which would work if i took away the (-) from -2.25x10^5 and added them up but that's a different way of doing it from the first so I'm confused as to which way is right.

The only difference in the questions that i see is there's no (+) in front of the 75uC

Thanks for any help you can give me
 
Physics news on Phys.org
GRAvit__ said:
1. What is the magnitude and direction of the electric field strength midway between a +60uC charge and a -30uC charge, if the charges are 2.0m apart?

2.E=kQ/r^2

3.
E1=Kx-30u/1
E2=-2.75x10^5

E2=kx60u/1
E2=5.4x10^5

Etotal=E1 + E2 ----> 2.7x10^5 N/C towards the - charge (my book says i have this right)

The problem that i have is that i came across a question that's almost the same but different answer.

1. What is the magnitude and direction of the electric field strength midway between a 75uC charge and a -25uC charge, if the charges are 2.0m apart?

Now i did everything the same as the first one and came to

E1=kx-25u/1
E1=-2.25x10^5

E2=kx75u/1
E2=6.75x10^5

Etotal=E1+E2 ----> 4.5x10^5 N/C towards the - charge (my book says its wrong)

Book answer : 9.0x10^5

which would work if i took away the (-) from -2.25x10^5 and added them up but that's a different way of doing it from the first so I'm confused as to which way is right.

The only difference in the questions that i see is there's no (+) in front of the 75uC

Thanks for any help you can give me
Your answer to the first problem is wrong too. The book is also wrong if it agreed with you.

Does the electric field due to a positive charge point towards it, or point a way from it?

Does the electric field due to a negative charge point towards it, or point a way from it?
 
The electric field would point away from a positive charge

The electric field would point towards a negative charge
 
(-)-------(m)---------(+)
<----- ...<-------

So you would just take out the negative and add it up? Negative is only referring to direction in this case?
 
GRAvit__ said:
(-)-------(m)---------(+)
<----- ...<-------

So you would just take out the negative and add it up? Negative is only referring to direction in this case?

Yes.

or they're both negative.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top