Electric field varying with distance

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 1K views
Jahnavi
Messages
848
Reaction score
102
[Moderator note: moved from general physics, no template.]

example.jpg


This is a solved example given in the book . Could someone help me understand how amplitude of electric field has an inverse relationship with distance ?

Only the very basics of EM waves are covered in the book so I would appreciate if someone could explain in a simple language .

Thank you .
 

Attachments

  • example.jpg
    example.jpg
    33.4 KB · Views: 992
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For a dipole antenna, the electric field of the radiated wave will stay parallel to the antenna dipole. This means the radiation pattern will mostly be 2 dimensional as a circle, centered at the transmitting antenna. As the circumference increases the field strength is "spread out" over more circumference.
So the electric field strength is divided by the length of the circumference. The circumference of a circle is proportional to r.
 
Recall that the irradiance (also called intensity) falls off as 1/r^2 (just think of the flux through spherical surfaces centered on the source) and is also proportional to E^2 (shown in just about every book, even if not derived). Putting both together,

[tex]I \propto 1/r^2 \propto E^2 => E \propto 1/r[/tex]
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jahnavi
RedDelicious said:
Recall that the irradiance (also called intensity) falls off as 1/r^2 (just think of the flux through spherical surfaces centered on the source) and is also proportional to E^2 (shown in just about every book, even if not derived). Putting both together,

[tex]I \propto 1/r^2 \propto E^2 => E \propto 1/r[/tex]

Thanks !