Electric fields, magnetic fields and Lorentz frames

golfingboy07
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Not sure how to go about proving that if E and B are perpendicular in one Lorentz frame they are perpendicular in all Lorentz frames.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Contract the tensor F with its dual. This will show that E.B is a Lorentz invariant.
 
ok. would you be able to start me off though?
 
Do you know the tensor F in terms of E and B?
If you don't know that much, you can't start the problem.
Go back to the textbook.
 
yes i know what the F tensor is in terms of the components of E and B
 
Last edited:
Find the dual tensor
{\cal F}_{\mu\nu}=\epsilon_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}F^{\rho\sigma}.
Then form the scalar
{\cal F}_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}.
This will be proportional to {\bf E\cdot B}.
My latex didn't work, so try to read the above. Sorry.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top