Electrostatic Clamps Using Dielectrics

jmtome2
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
b]1. Homework Statement [/b]
Electrostatic clamps are used for holding workpieces while they are being machined, for holding silicon wafers during electron beam microfabrication, etc. They comprise an insulated conducting plate maintained at a potential of several thousand volts and covered with a thin insulating sheet. The workpiece or the wafer resets on the sheet and is grounded. It is advisabled to apply a film of oil to the sheet to prevent sparking.

One particular type operates at 300 volts and has holding power of 2 atmospheres. If the insulator is Mylar (Class-A; \epsilon_r=3.2, what is its thickness?


Homework Equations



F=-\frac{dW}{dx}

W=\frac{1}{2}CV^{2}

Q=CV


The Attempt at a Solution


Can I treat this system as a parallel plate conductor with a dielectric in the center? I don't see how to extract the thickness from this.

F==-\frac{dW}{dx}=\frac{1}{2}\frac{Q^2}{C^2}\frac{dC}{dx}=\frac{1}{2}V^2\frac{dC}{dx}

But the capacitance is constant C=\frac{Q}{\Delta V} meaning F becomes zero... which does not makes sense...

Is there another way to calculate the capacitance?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I know the capacitance of a parallel plate configuration with dielectric filling the middle is C=\frac{A\epsilon_0\epsilon_r}{d}, but I also know that the grounded "plate" on top throws this off... I'm just not sure how
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top