Electrostatic potential and electric fields

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electrostatic potential and electric field at the center of a square formed by four charged particles. In Arrangement 1, where charges of the same sign are at opposite corners, the electrostatic potential and electric field at the center are both determined to be zero due to cancellation effects. For Arrangement 2, where the configuration of charges is altered, participants seek clarification on how to approach the calculations. The key takeaway is that the potential can be summed from each charge, and understanding this principle is crucial for solving the problem. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the importance of grasping the underlying concepts rather than just providing answers.
secret5437
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



3. Four charged particles are held fixed at the corners of a square of
side s. All the charges have the same magnitude Q, but two are
positive and two are negative. In Arrangement 1, shown ,
charges of the same sign are at opposite corners. Express your
answers to parts (a) and (b) in terms of the given quantities and
fundamental constants.

(a) For Arrangement 1, determine the following.
i. The electrostatic potential at the center of the square
ii. The magnitude of the electric field at the center of the square

The bottom two charged particles are now switched to form Arrangement 2,
shown , in which the positively charged particles are on the left and the
negatively charged particles are on the right.

(b) For Arrangement 2, determine the following.

i. The electrostatic potential at the center of the square
ii. The magnitude of the electric field at the center of the square

In which of the two arrangements would more work be required to remove the particle at the upper right corner from its present position to a distance a long way away from the arrangement? Justify your answer.



Homework Equations



V = KQ/r
E = KQ/r2



The Attempt at a Solution



I'm pretty sure the answer for Arrangement 1 is 0, for parts i. and ii.
Help on Arrangement 2, please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You haven't given any information on what arrangement 2 is.
Or on what you did for part (a). We helpers don't really like to work out all the details to check an answer - that's your job! We love to help with the understanding, though.
 
I know that the answer to Arrangement 1 is 0, because the two positive and two negative charges cancel each other out.
 
and arrangement 2 looks like this:

Q+......Q-




Q+......Q-






Arrangement 1 looks like this:
Q+.....Q-





Q-......Q+


(imagine those two arrangements as squares)
 
Oh, clever of you! Yes, I think you are right, though it seems a bit surprising at first that you can just add the potentials due to each charge. I looked it up to make sure!
I guess that is the clue for the second arrangement!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top