Engineering Dynamics: Solving Train Decel on Slope

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the deceleration of a 160-Mg train climbing a slope at 80 km/h, given specific traction and resistance forces. Participants emphasize the importance of correctly summing forces in both x and y directions while considering the slope's angle. A common issue noted is the miscalculation of forces, particularly the traction force, which should be accurately represented in the equations. The need for clear reasoning and proper vector breakdown is highlighted to avoid errors in dynamics problems. Overall, the conversation aims to establish a reliable method for tackling similar engineering dynamics challenges.
JaredPM
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The 160-Mg train travels with a speed of 80 kmlh when it starts to climb the slope. If the engine exerts a traction force F of 1120 of the weight of the train and the rolling resistance F D is equal to 1/500 of the weight of the train, determine the deceleration of the train. slope is y=1 and x=10
Capture.PNG


****See attached files for picture.

Homework Equations


I summed the forces in the x and y directions because it is going up a slope.

The Attempt at a Solution


the solution I keep getting is in the right direction, but is 1.0m/s^2 off. i.e. -1.5m/s^2 roughly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The engine exerts a traction force of F(1/20) of the weight of the train. Not 1120
 
Show your work. Simply telling us the wrong answer you got isn't very helpful in seeing where you might have gone wrong.
 
∑F(x)=Fcos(5.7)-F(Resistance)cos(5.7)-F(Normal)cos(84.3)-mg*cos(84.3)=ma
∑F(y)=Fsin(5.7)-F(Resistance)sin(5.7)+F(Normal)sin(84.3)-mg*sin(84.3)=ma

I uploaded a free-body diagram.
 

Attachments

  • f=ma.png
    f=ma.png
    10.8 KB · Views: 458
Can you explain your reasoning behind the equations?
 
Well I wanted to prove that the axis didn't need to be rotated. It certainly makes things easier if you do, but I wanted to break everything down into components to get a better understanding of how all of the forces are represented in the problem by using vectors. I want a fool proof way to begin dynamics. I did the above equation way wrong. I didn't give acceleration components for x or y most importantly.

I'm just trying to find a common approach to problems. Pulleys are different.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top