Engineering Dynamics: Solving Train Decel on Slope

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the deceleration of a 160-Mg train climbing a slope at 80 km/h, given specific traction and resistance forces. Participants emphasize the importance of correctly summing forces in both x and y directions while considering the slope's angle. A common issue noted is the miscalculation of forces, particularly the traction force, which should be accurately represented in the equations. The need for clear reasoning and proper vector breakdown is highlighted to avoid errors in dynamics problems. Overall, the conversation aims to establish a reliable method for tackling similar engineering dynamics challenges.
JaredPM
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The 160-Mg train travels with a speed of 80 kmlh when it starts to climb the slope. If the engine exerts a traction force F of 1120 of the weight of the train and the rolling resistance F D is equal to 1/500 of the weight of the train, determine the deceleration of the train. slope is y=1 and x=10
Capture.PNG


****See attached files for picture.

Homework Equations


I summed the forces in the x and y directions because it is going up a slope.

The Attempt at a Solution


the solution I keep getting is in the right direction, but is 1.0m/s^2 off. i.e. -1.5m/s^2 roughly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The engine exerts a traction force of F(1/20) of the weight of the train. Not 1120
 
Show your work. Simply telling us the wrong answer you got isn't very helpful in seeing where you might have gone wrong.
 
∑F(x)=Fcos(5.7)-F(Resistance)cos(5.7)-F(Normal)cos(84.3)-mg*cos(84.3)=ma
∑F(y)=Fsin(5.7)-F(Resistance)sin(5.7)+F(Normal)sin(84.3)-mg*sin(84.3)=ma

I uploaded a free-body diagram.
 

Attachments

  • f=ma.png
    f=ma.png
    10.8 KB · Views: 463
Can you explain your reasoning behind the equations?
 
Well I wanted to prove that the axis didn't need to be rotated. It certainly makes things easier if you do, but I wanted to break everything down into components to get a better understanding of how all of the forces are represented in the problem by using vectors. I want a fool proof way to begin dynamics. I did the above equation way wrong. I didn't give acceleration components for x or y most importantly.

I'm just trying to find a common approach to problems. Pulleys are different.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top