Find the scalar value and direction of the electric field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field and its direction between two charged balls. The scalar values of the electric fields from points A and B were found to be 287680 N/C and 199778 N/C, respectively, leading to a resultant electric field at point C of 255341 N/C. The confusion arises in determining the correct angle between the electric field vectors, where the appropriate cosine rule formula involves EC, EA, and EB in a specific arrangement. The correct calculation for the angle β yields 42.65 degrees, clarifying the proper application of the cosine rule. The participants resolve the misunderstanding regarding the placement of values in the equation, confirming the accuracy of the solution.
HJKL
Messages
13
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Two charged balls are placed in point A and B and the distance between them is 9,54cm. Each of the balls are charged with 8,0 x 10^-8 C. Find the scalar value and direction of the electric field in point C placed 5 cm from A and 6 cm from B.

Homework Equations


Cosine Rule: a^2 = b^2 + c^2 - 2ab x cosθ
E = Ke x (q/r^2)

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I have calculated the electric field of A and B.
EA = 287680 N/C
EB = 199778 N/C

After that I used cosine rule to calculate EC and got EC = 255341 N/C. This is correct.

But when I try finding the direction I calculate the angle between EC and EA (β) like this:
β = cos^-1 ((EA^2 + EB^2-EC^2)/(2EAEB)) = 60 degrees

The solution says that I should calculate the angle between EC and EA (β), but that the equation looks like this:
β = cos^-1 ((EC^2 + EA^2-EB^2)/(2ECEA)) = 42,65 degrees

Why am I supposed to use that equation?
 

Attachments

  • tempsnip.png
    tempsnip.png
    43 KB · Views: 528
Physics news on Phys.org
The wrong thing is your Cosine rule at the first line of your "relevant equation". Please check again :wink:
 
Oh! No, its not that. I just wrote it down wrong here:smile: I've used c^2 = a^2 + b^2 - 2ab * cosθ, and I get the first part right. I just don't get why I'm supposted to use this equation β = cos^-1 ((EC^2 + EA^2-EB^2)/(2EC EA)) to find the direction.
 
But...the answer in the solution is a correct answer, just compare to the Cosine rule :eek:
You wrote down the correct cosine rule, as above, but when you put ##E_{A}, E_{B}, E_{C}## into your calculation, I see that you put them in the wrong place
 
I was a bit confused about which angles goes with which side, but I get it now. Thank you!:smile:
 
  • Like
Likes Nguyen Son
Hope this figure can help you :-p
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20180526_224054.jpg
    IMG_20180526_224054.jpg
    37.6 KB · Views: 504
  • Like
Likes HJKL
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top