Finding stress energy tensor of a rod under tension

demonelite123
Messages
216
Reaction score
0
I am given a rod with mass per unit length \mu, cross sectional area A, and under a tension F. I am also told that the tension F is uniform over the cross sectional area A. Find the stress energy tensor inside the rod.

I know that for the stress energy tensor T^{00} gives the energy density, T^{0i} gives the energy flux through a i-surface, T^{i0} gives the i-momentum density, and T^{ij} gives the i-momentum flux through a j-surface.

I have that T^{00} = \mu / A and that T^{0i} = T^{i0} = 0 since the rod is stationary so the particles have no net momentum. As for T^{ij}, if i assume that the rod is lying lengthwise along the x axis, then T^{11} = F/A since the momentum flux is the momentum per unit time per unit area or in other words the force per unit area. Then it seems to me that T^{ij} = 0 for all other entries since the tension acts along the x direction.

Therefore the stress energy tensor only has 2 nonzero entries on the main diagonal, and the rest of the entries are 0. Am I missing something here? It seems too simple a form to have and I am not sure if i took everything into account.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The stress energy tensor inside the rod is: T^{00} = \mu / A T^{ij} = 0 (for all i,j except for i = j = 1)T^{11} = F/A
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top