Finding the Auxillary Field of a Long Copper Rod

  • Thread starter Thread starter thatguy14
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Copper Field Rod
thatguy14
Messages
45
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am looking at an example problem in the text and they skipped some steps. I think I am missing somthing obvious but none-the-less I don't know what is going on.

We have a long copper rod o radius R which carries a uniformly distributed (free) current I. Find H, the auxillary field inside and outside the rod.


Homework Equations



\oint H dot dl = Free current enclosed

The Attempt at a Solution



so the LHS would be (magnitude only) H*2pis for some amperian loop. Now I don't know how to get the Free current enclosed inside and outside the rod.

Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Amperian loops are always closed curves (that's because the line integral at LHS is closed), so they are always the circumference of a surface. In our case this is the surface of a circle with radius \displaystyle{s}. The current at RHS is the total current that goes through this surface. When you are outside of the cylinder it's easy to find this current. When you are inside, you just have to take into account that the current is uniformly distributed.
 
I mostly understand that. The answer the book gives for I free is = (I*pi*s^2)/(pi*R^2) which makes sense, but I am looking for what definition they used exactly to get that. What equation?
 
You can get this by using the current density vector \displaystyle{\vec{J}}. This is the current that flows through a unit area of the wire crossection (or for uniform distributions the ratio current/area). For this case the current flows only in a specific direction, so it's not necessary to use vectors. We can just say that:
\displaystyle{J=\frac{I}{\pi R^2}}
because the current is uniformly distributed. The current we need is given by a surface integral:
\displaystyle{I_{f,enc}=\int _{S}JdS}
where \displaystyle{S} is the circle's surface. Actually the integral is an overkill, because \displaystyle{J} is constant here. If you have seen any applications of Gauss's law, it's like using the charge density in electrostatics.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top