Fluid Mechanics~ Wall shear stress

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding wall shear stress in fluid mechanics, particularly in the context of homework problems. The initial confusion is about the definition of wall shear stress and its calculation using Newton's Law of Viscosity. Participants clarify that wall shear stress can be expressed as τ_w = μ * (d/dy)[U sin(πy/2δ)] evaluated at y=0. They also derive relationships involving τ_w and its dependence on the flow parameters, ultimately confirming that τ_w = (μUπ)/(2δ) is the correct formulation. The thread highlights the importance of correctly interpreting the equations to solve related problems effectively.
Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


Picture1-31.png


My main problem here is that I do not understand what they are asking. What is the wall shear stress? Do they mean the stress at the "floor" (or whatever you want to call it)?

If so, I am assuming I use Newton's Law of Viscosity \tau=\mu\frac{du}{dy} since this is 1-dimensional flow.

Would the wall shear stress \tau_w be given by

\tau_w=\int_{y=0}^\delta \tau(y)\, dy

and then the problem reduces to finding an expression for \tau(y)

Or am I way off here? thanks :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I just found http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Wall_shear_stress" . So I guess my interpretation was wrong.

So, according to this definition, I should have:

\tau_w=\mu*\frac{d}{dy}[U\sin(\frac{\pi y}{2\delta})]|_{y=0}Is that all?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Saladsamurai said:
I just found http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Wall_shear_stress" . So I guess my interpretation was wrong.

So, according to this definition, I should have:

\tau_w=\mu*\frac{d}{dy}[U\sin(\frac{\pi y}{2\delta})]|_{y=0}Is that all?

Not that anyone will respond to this (since no one ever looks in this forum), but I am assuming that if the above is correct, than part (b) is as simple as solving

\frac{1}{2}\tau_w=\mu*\frac{d}{dy}[U\sin(\frac{\pi y}{2\delta})]

for y.

Sound good? Good :smile:

So I have:

\frac{\tau_w}{2}=\mu U\cos(\frac{\pi y}{2\delta})*\frac{\pi}{2\delta}

\Rightarrow \frac{\tau_w\delta}{\mu U\pi}=\cos(\frac{\pi y}{2\delta})
 
Last edited by a moderator:
71 views, no responses. Yesssss I am just going to keep chatting it up with myself.

Maybe I can set a new record?

Has there ever been a thread locked where there was only one speaker?

Oops! Don't answer that :smile:

I need help. (The kind PF cannot offer)
 
I'm going to reply to this thread, just to break your monologue. =)
 
I agree with Saladsamurai.

τw = μ×\frac{d}{dy}[Usin(\frac{\pi y}{2δ})]|y=0

so that, τw = 180\piμ

and τ = μ×\frac{d}{dy}[Usin(\frac{\pi y}{2δ})] when τ = τw/2

thus, 90\piμ = μ×\frac{d}{dy}[Usin(\frac{\pi y}{2δ})]

\frac{1}{2} = cos(\frac{\pi y}{2δ})

\frac{\pi}{3} = \frac{\pi y}{2δ}

y = 0.02 m
 
Saladsamurai said:
I just found This. So I guess my interpretation was wrong.

So, according to this definition, I should have:

\tau_w=\mu*[U\sin(\frac{\pi y}{2\delta})]|_{y=0}


Is that all?

Yes. If you actually apply the above formula, you get

τw=(μUπ)/(2δ)

Is that what you got?
 
Back
Top