Flux of a point charge through a circle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the correct option for the flux of a point charge through a circle using Gauss's law. As the distance d decreases, the flux increases, leading to the consideration of options (a) and (d). A cylindrical approach is employed to analyze the flux, revealing that the required flux should be less than Q/(2ε₀), which eliminates option (d) for R > 2d. The conclusion is that option (a) is correct, and participants explore whether there are simpler methods to arrive at this conclusion. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the realization that half the flux exits the circle, clarifying the understanding of the problem.
Pushoam
Messages
961
Reaction score
53

Homework Statement


upload_2017-12-12_15-23-19.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I will try to choose the correct option using the common sense instead of solving it.

As d decreases, the flux should increase. For R>>d, only option (a) and (d) satisfy this condition.

Now, for choosing between (a) and (d),

Let us consider a cylinder of radius R and length 2d placed symmetric about the charge Q.

Now, using the Gauss's law,

##2\int_{S_{circular} } \vec E \cdot d \vec A + \int_{S_{curved}} \vec E \cdot d \vec A = \frac { Q } {\epsilon_0 } ##

##\int_{S_{circular} } \vec E \cdot d \vec A = \frac { Q } {2 \epsilon_0 } - \int_{S_{curved}} \vec E \cdot d \vec A##

So, the required flux should be less than ##\frac { Q } {2 \epsilon_0 }##.

For R>2d, option (d) does not satisfy the above condition.

So, the correct option is (a).

Is there a way to get the correct option easier than this?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-12-12_15-23-19.png
    upload_2017-12-12_15-23-19.png
    7.9 KB · Views: 2,141
Physics news on Phys.org
Pushoam said:
Is there a way to get the correct option easier than this?
You could consider an extreme value of d.
 
haruspex said:
You could consider an extreme value of d.
The extreme value of d could be either o or infinity. Right?
If I take d as infinity, then I will have to struggle with option a and d.
If I take d near to 0, then using a small cylinder and the abv approach, it gives option a as then I can neglect the flux due to the curved surface..
But, still, I will have to use that cyllinder approach.

Is there any other easier way?
 
Pushoam said:
But, still, I will have to use that cyllinder approach.
Isn't it obvious that half the flux goes each way out of the circle?
 
haruspex said:
Isn't it obvious that half the flux goes each way out of the circle?
For me,
earliier it wasn't .
now it is.
Thanks for it.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
I was thinking using 2 purple mattress samples, and taping them together, I do want other ideas though, the main guidelines are; Must have a volume LESS than 1600 cubic centimeters, and CAN'T exceed 25 cm in ANY direction. Must be LESS than 1 kg. NO parachutes. NO glue or Tape can touch the egg. MUST be able to take egg out in less than 1 minute. Grade A large eggs will be used.
Back
Top